Citation network
Opper Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 06, 1954
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Opper v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 348 U.S. 84 (1954) U.S. Supreme Court Opper v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 348 U.S. 84 (1954) Opper v. UnitedSearch
-
See Warszower v. UnitedSearch
-
inducement to receive the prohibited compensation or an illegal acceptance of promise to pay. In Warszower v. UnitedSearch
-
Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
Such admissions have the same possibilities for error as confessions. They, too, must be corroborated. See Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
On this point, the cases in the federal courts show divergence. One line of cases follows the rule set out in Daeche v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 348 U. S. 93 Other decisions tend to follow the rule enunciated in Forte v. UnitedSearch
-
thus corroborating it while also establishing independently the other necessary elements of the offense. Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
is Affirmed. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER concurs in the result. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, believing that Forte v. UnitedSearch
-
Warszower v. UnitedSearch
-
Calderon v. UnitedSearch
-
Pines v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Gulotta v. UnitedSearch
-
I Phillipps and Arnold, Evidence (5th Am. ed.), p. 441. In manslaughter, this conclusion is cautiously applied. Regina v. BurtonSearch
-
Bram v. UnitedSearch
-
E.g., Jordan v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. KertessSearch
-
Forlini v. UnitedSearch
-
Accord, United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
Pearlman v. UnitedSearch
-
Wynkoop v. UnitedSearch
-
Bolland v. UnitedSearch
-
Ercoli v. UnitedSearch
-
each of the main elements or constituent parts of the corpus delicti. Also following this rule, e.g., Pines v. UnitedSearch
-
Ryan v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. FenwickSearch
-
Waldeck v. UnitedSearch
-
Olmstead v. UnitedSearch
-
Metcalf v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Opper v. UnitedSearch
-
In Warszower v. UnitedSearch
-
See Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
Daeche v. UnitedSearch
-
Forte v. UnitedSearch
-
Regina v. BurtonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial