Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Edelman Vs. California

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 12, 1953

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 4 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. Vs. Mcgrew US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1903
  2. Powell Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Nov 07, 1932
  3. Woods Vs. Nierstheimer US Supreme Court · May 20, 1946
  4. Mooney Vs. Holohan US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1935
  5. U.S. 357 (1953) U.S. Supreme Court Edelman v. California
    Search
  6. U.S. 357 (1953) Edelman v. California
    Search
  7. when the federal questions are not seasonably raised in accordance with the requirements of state law. Hulbert v. City
    Search
  8. law determined this action, there is no federal question preserved for review in this aspect of the case. Hedgebeth v. North
    Search
  9. People v. Stone
    Search
  10. s motion, therefore, rested on an adequate state ground, his choice of the wrong remedy under local law. Woods v. Nierstheimer
    Search
  11. there is serious doubt about the nature of the ground on which the decision below rested. Cf. State Tax Commission v. Van
    Search
  12. Minnesota v. National
    Search
  13. on the merits, whatever may be their appeal. The writ was improvidently granted, and must be dismissed. Stembridge v. Georgia
    Search
  14. See People v. Garza
    Search
  15. People v. Sukovitzen
    Search
  16. Cal.App.2d 901, 155 P.2d 406 (1945). To the same effect, Dowd v. United
    Search
  17. See People v. McDermott
    Search
  18. presumption that a state will not deny a remedy for deprivation of a constitutional right such as here alleged. Mooney v. Holohan
    Search
  19. test the constitutionality of the Vagrancy Act, he could then seek relief in a United States district court. See Moore v. Dempsey
    Search
  20. be to vacate the appellate court's judgment for a clarification of the bases of its action. See State Tax Commission v. Van
    Search
  21. Herb v. Pitcairn
    Search
  22. Winters v. New
    Search
  23. Schneider v. New
    Search
  24. In Cochran v. Kansas
    Search
  25. statute is sufficient to show its similarity to a New Jersey law held invalid for vagueness and ambiguity in Lanzetta v. New
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Edelman v. California
    Search
  27. Hulbert v. City
    Search
  28. Hedgebeth v. North
    Search
  29. Cf. State Tax Commission v. Van
    Search
  30. Stembridge v. Georgia
    Search
  31. Dowd v. United
    Search
  32. See Moore v. Dempsey
    Search
  33. See State Tax Commission v. Van
    Search
  34. Lanzetta v. New
    Search
  35. Herb v. Pitcairn
    Search
  36. Cole v. Arkansas
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales