Citation network
Bode Vs. Barrett
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 09, 1953
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 583 (1953) U.S. Supreme Court Bode v. BarrettSearch
-
U.S. 583 (1953) Bode v. BarrettSearch
-
McCarroll v. DixieSearch
-
but has the same infirmities as the tax on motor vehicles which the Court invalidated in Interstate Transit, Inc. v. LindseySearch
-
Clearly it is within the police power of Illinois to exact such a tax, at least from intrastate operators. Hendrick v. MarylandSearch
-
the burden of showing that the tax deprives them of rights which the Commerce Clause protects. Cf. Southern R. Co. v. KingSearch
-
The case is therefore to be distinguished from those situations where by nature of the tax or its incidence, Sprout v. SouthSearch
-
Spector Motor Service v. O'ConnorSearch
-
is limited only if, in substance and effect, it is the exertion of a different and a forbidden power, Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSearch
-
U. S. 44 , as, for example, the taxation of a privilege protected by the First Amendment. See Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
since neither private nor public carriers have the right to use the highways without payment of a fee, see Hendrick v. MarylandSearch
-
dignity, no showing is made that any of the appellants is the victim of an invidious classification. Cf. Stephenson v. BinfordSearch
-
residents. That objection, so far as the Fourteenth Amendment is concerned, was adequately answered in Storaasli v. MinnesotaSearch
-
of the Constitution. See St. Louis & S.F. R. Co. v. JamesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Kane v. NewSearch
-
Together with No. 274, Co-Ordinated Transport, Inc., et al. v. BarrettSearch
-
Cf. Southern R. Co. v. KingSearch
-
Page 344 U. S. 589 As far back as 1888, in Leloup v. PortSearch
-
Indeed, ever since Western Union Tel. Co. v. KansasSearch
-
U. S. 1 , and Pullman Co. v. KansasSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Bode v. BarrettSearch
-
Hendrick v. MarylandSearch
-
Sprout v. SouthSearch
-
Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSearch
-
the First Amendment. See Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Cf. Stephenson v. BinfordSearch
-
Storaasli v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Leloup v. PortSearch
-
Western Union Tel. Co. v. KansasSearch
-
and Pullman Co. v. KansasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial