Citation network
Wells Vs. Simonds Abrasive Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 18, 1953
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Wells v. SimondsSearch
-
Abrasive Co. - 345 U.S. 514 (1953) U.S. Supreme Court Wells v. SimondsSearch
-
Abrasive Co., 345 U.S. 514 (1953) Wells v. SimondsSearch
-
foreign statute creating a substantive right unknown to the common law. Pp. 345 U. S. 517 -518. (c) Engel v. DavenportSearch
-
U. S. 609 , and First Nat. Bank v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Federal Constitution. The states are free to adopt such rules of conflict of laws as they choose, Kryger v. WilsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the statute of limitations of the forum to a foreign substantive right did not deny full faith and credit, McElmoyle v. CohenSearch
-
Order of United Commercial Travelers v. WolfeSearch
-
for constitutional distinctions under the Full Faith and Credit Clause. We agree with the respondent that Engel v. DavenportSearch
-
Our decisions in Hughes v. FetterSearch
-
U. S. 609 (1951), and First National Bank v. UnitedSearch
-
F.2d 814 (1952). See also Quinn v. SimondsSearch
-
Cf. dissenting opinion by MR. JUSTICE BLACK, Order of United Commercial Travelers v. WolfeSearch
-
Cristilly v. WarnerSearch
-
Conn. 461, 88 A. 711, overruled on another ground, Daury v. FerraroSearch
-
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. BurkhartSearch
-
Negaubauer v. GreatSearch
-
White v. GovatosSearch
-
Tieffenbrun v. FlannerySearch
-
Rosenzweig v. HellerSearch
-
as to liability and as to limitation. The respondent relies upon the line of cases that began with Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
that this result depended on the New York law of conflicts, which is not even paid the respect of mention. Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
U. S. 542 , 234 U. S. 547 . See also Slater v. MexicanSearch
-
Cardozo, J. in Loucks v. StandardSearch
-
Stat. 812, 843. Klaxon Co. v. StentorSearch
-
Klaxon Co. v. StentorSearch
-
that it does differ from that of the forum. But that disparity does not cause the type of evil aimed at in Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
These are broad and imprecise, and involve such considerations as the state of the court's docket. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSearch
-
measure of damages, limitations, admission of evidence, conflict of laws and other doctrines, see Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSearch
-
non conveniens route opens up possibilities of conflict, confusion, and injustice greater than anything Swift v. TysonSearch
-
Court not by grace of Pennsylvania, but by authority of Congress, and what I said in First National Bank of Chicago v. UnitedSearch
-
Air Lines, 342 U. S. 396 , 342 U. S. 398 , seems to me applicable here. I had supposed, before Hughes v. FetterSearch
-
Page 345 U. S. 523 be tried in accordance with the law of the place of the wrong. Neither Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSearch
-
U. S. 99 , nor Ragan v. MerchantsSearch
-
the state of the forum along with the right is a more difficult question in the light of our precedents. McElmoyle v. CohenSearch
-
were required to conform to local rules of procedure, although often independent of local substantive law under Swift v. TysonSearch
-
substantive law is. But, in Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSearch
-
on which McElmoyle v. CohenSearch
-
Ragan v. MerchantsSearch
-
forum must apply a foreign statute of limitations to a contract case. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. WolfeSearch
-
U. S. 214 . Subsequently, Mr. Justice Holmes twice wrote for the Court to the same effect. In Davis v. MillsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial