Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Holmes Vs. U S

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 08, 1953

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

53 entries 7 linked 46 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Holmes US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1820
  2. Billings Vs. Truesdell US Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1944
  3. Orloff Vs. Willoughby US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1953
  4. United States Vs. Nugent US Supreme Court · Jun 08, 1953
  5. Ludecke Vs. Watkins US Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1948
  6. Silesian-american Corp Vs. Clark US Supreme Court · Dec 08, 1947
  7. Knauff Vs. Shaughnessy US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 1949
  8. U.S. 936 (1953) U.S. Supreme Court HOLMES v. U S
    Search
  9. U.S. 936 (1968) 391 U.S. 936 Albert H. HOLMES, petitioner, v. UNITED
    Search
  10. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Denied. Memorandum of Mr. Justice STEWART. This case, like Hart v. United
    Search
  11. United States v. Holmes
    Search
  12. United States v. Henderson
    Search
  13. F.2d 711 (C.A. 7th Cir.), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 963, and Etcheverry v. United
    Search
  14. in absence of a declaration of war. Our cases suggest (but do not decide) that there may not be. In Hamilton v. Regents
    Search
  15. Street v. United
    Search
  16. Billings v. Truesdell
    Search
  17. Orloff v. Willoughby
    Search
  18. Japan (April 28, 1952). No question of unlawful peacetime draft was raised or alluded to in the case. United States v. Nugent
    Search
  19. accompanying the Korean conflict.6 The Court has held that 'War does not cease with a cease-fire order . ...' Ludecke v. Watkins
    Search
  20. (Woods v. Cloyd
    Search
  21. U.S. 138, 141 ), and empowers the Government 'to guard against the immediate renewal of the conflict.' Hamilton v. Kentucky
    Search
  22. Distilleries & Warehouse Co., 251 U.S. 146, 161 , 40 S. Ct. 106 (quoting from Stewart v. Kahn
    Search
  23. inductions. In World War II Germany surrendered May 8, 1945, and Japan surrendered September 2, 1945. See Lee v. Madigan
    Search
  24. See Lee v. Madigan
    Search
  25. Silesian-American Corp. v. Clark
    Search
  26. United States v. Mac-
    Search
  27. Kneedler v. Lane
    Search
  28. The President v. the
    Search
  29. (Kneedler v. Lane
    Search
  30. In Lichter v. United
    Search
  31. exercise of the war power was, therefore, not involved in Lichter. Footnote 6 Cf. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
    Search
  32. In Lee v. Madigan
    Search
  33. Reid v. Covert
    Search
  34. Ludecke v. Watkins
    Search
  35. Knauff v. Shaughnessy
    Search
  36. Woods v. Cloyd
    Search
  37. W. Miller Co., 333 U.S. 138 , and conserving manpower by forbidding liquor, Hamilton v. Kentucky
    Search
  38. should be reversed and the vessel and cargo restored.' 2 Black 698-699. Footnote 10 See United States v. Smith
    Search
  39. U.S. Supreme Court HOLMES v. U S
    Search
  40. Hart v. United
    Search
  41. United States v. Henderson
    Search
  42. and Etcheverry v. United
    Search
  43. In Hamilton v. Regents
    Search
  44. Hamilton v. Kentucky
    Search
  45. Stewart v. Kahn
    Search
  46. See Lee v. Madigan
    Search
  47. United States v. Mac-
    Search
  48. Kneedler v. Lane
    Search
  49. In Lichter v. United
    Search
  50. Cf. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial