Citation network
United States Vs. Grainger
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1953
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 235 (1953) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. GraingerSearch
-
U.S. 235 (1953) United States v. GraingerSearch
-
JUSTICE BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court. These cases were argued immediately following No. 548, Bridges v. UnitedSearch
-
The offenses thus come within the period to which the Suspension Act applies. United States v. SmithSearch
-
placed emphasis also upon the following statement by Mr. Justice Roberts, speaking for the Court, in United States v. SchartonSearch
-
section, though denominated a proviso, is an excepting clause, and therefore to be narrowly construed. United States v. McElvainSearch
-
began to run for the first time on January 1, 1950, and expired December 31, 1952. United States v. SmithSearch
-
U.S. at 342 U. S. 231 . This issue was before the Court in No. 527, United States v. KlingerSearch
-
FRANKFURTER, and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, adopting the reasoning in the opinion of Judge Learned Hand in United States v. KlingerSearch
-
Together with No. 635, United States v. ClavereSearch
-
et al., and No. 636, United States v. ClavereSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
No.2714, 3 CFR, 1946 Supp., 77-78, and therefore, after the period to which the Suspension Act applied. United States v. SmithSearch
-
Act expired before the indictments were found. We treat the appeals as presenting both issues. See United States v. BordenSearch
-
United States v. Curtiss-WrightSearch
-
Export Corp., 299 U. S. 304 . See also United States v. HarkSearch
-
and United States v. KisselSearch
-
The false statement clause of the False Claims Act, which was involved in Marzani v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. GraingerSearch
-
Bridges v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SmithSearch
-
United States v. KlingerSearch
-
United States v. ClavereSearch
-
See United States v. BordenSearch
-
Marzani v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BarberSearch
-
United States v. NoveckSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial