Citation network
Burns Vs. Wilson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1953
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 137 (1953) U.S. Supreme Court Burns v. WilsonSearch
-
U.S. 137 (1953) Burns v. WilsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
as well as jurisdiction to impose the sentences Page 346 U. S. 139 which petitioners received. Dennis v. LovettSearch
-
mass of evidence to be found in the transcripts of the trial and other proceedings before the military court. Burns v. LovettSearch
-
corpus, the inquiry, the scope of matters open for review, has always been more narrow than in civil cases. Hiatt v. BrownSearch
-
not displace the civil courts' jurisdiction over an application for habeas corpus from the military prisoner. Gusik v. SchilderSearch
-
application, it is not open to a federal civil court to grant the writ simply to reevaluate the evidence. Whelchel v. McDonaldSearch
-
of the civil courts to determine whether the military have given fair consideration to each of these claims. Whelchel v. McDonaldSearch
-
See Dynes v. HooverSearch
-
See Gusik v. SchilderSearch
-
See Hiatt v. BrownSearch
-
We reject petitioners' contentions that the rule of McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
Gallegos v. NebraskaSearch
-
This case was cited and an excerpt from the above quoted with approval in Hiatt v. BrownSearch
-
See my dissent in Sunal v. LargeSearch
-
Hamilton v. KentuckySearch
-
whether the military tribunal has exceeded the powers granted it by Congress may be tested by habeas corpus. See Hiatt v. BrownSearch
-
commissions. Nor do the courts sit in review of the weight of the evidence before the military tribunal. Whelchel v. McDonaldSearch
-
against double jeopardy is one of those provisions. And, consistently with the construction I urge, we held in Wade v. HunterSearch
-
and, like the accused in criminal cases, see Moore v. DempseySearch
-
undisputed facts in this case make a prima facie case that our rule on coerced confessions expressed in Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
drawn from the admitted facts, the question whether a confession was voluntary is for the triers of the facts ( Lyons v. OklahomaSearch
-
and observation, is presumptively correct, and will not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous ( MGM Corporation v. FearSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Burns v. WilsonSearch
-
Dennis v. LovettSearch
-
Burns v. LovettSearch
-
of McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
Moore v. DempseySearch
-
Lyons v. OklahomaSearch
-
MGM Corporation v. FearSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial