Citation network
Sweeney Vs. Woodall
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1952
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 86 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Sweeney v. WoodallSearch
-
U.S. 86 (1952) Sweeney v. WoodallSearch
-
In re Woodall, 88 Ohio App. 202, 89 N.E.2d 493. An appeal to the State's Supreme Court was dismissed. Woodall v. SweeneySearch
-
Ohio St. 368, 89 N.E.2d 494. This Court denied a petition for certiorari. Woodall v. SweeneySearch
-
claim. 194 F.2d 542. Petitioner has now applied to this Court for a writ of certiorari. Recently, in Dye v. JohnsonSearch
-
still another fugitive, holding that the federal courts in the asylum should not entertain such applications. Johnson v. MathewsSearch
-
In other similar cases, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Ross v. MiddlebrooksSearch
-
F.2d 308 (1951), and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, in Davis v. O'ConnellSearch
-
F.2d 513, have reached a like result. In United States ex rel. Jackson v. RuthazerSearch
-
Cf. Drew v. ThawSearch
-
the petitioner from invoking the aid of the local courts nor readily open the door to such a claim. Compare Cochran v. KansasSearch
-
must exhaust his state Page 344 U. S. 93 remedies. The enlightened view is indeed the other way. See Johnson v. DyeSearch
-
Johnson v. MatthewsSearch
-
Commonwealth v. SuperintendentSearch
-
use of habeas corpus to test the legality of the treatment of a prisoner who has been lawfully convicted. In Cochran v. KansasSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
that clause be construed as incorporating the entire Bill of Rights or only some of its guaranties. See Adamson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
here are so shocking as to violate the standards of decency implicit in our system of jurisprudence. Cf. Francis v. ResweberSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Sweeney v. WoodallSearch
-
Woodall v. SweeneySearch
-
Dye v. JohnsonSearch
-
Johnson v. MathewsSearch
-
Ross v. MiddlebrooksSearch
-
Davis v. O'ConnellSearch
-
Jackson v. RuthazerSearch
-
Compare Cochran v. KansasSearch
-
See Johnson v. DyeSearch
-
In Cochran v. KansasSearch
-
See Adamson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Cf. Francis v. ResweberSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial