Citation network
Guessefeldt Vs. Mcgrath
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 28, 1952
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 308 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Guessefeldt v. McGrathSearch
-
U.S. 308 (1952) Guessefeldt v. McGrathSearch
-
the decisions of lower courts on this issue, which we note without specifically approving any of them. See McGrath v. ZanderSearch
-
Josephberg v. MarkhamSearch
-
Stadtmuller v. MillerSearch
-
Vowinckel v. FirstSearch
-
Sarthou v. ClarkSearch
-
a) action. Central Union Trust Co. v. GarvanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Clark v. UeberseeSearch
-
Becker Steel Co. v. CummingsSearch
-
at the end of World War I, confirmed the possession of vested enemy property by the United States. Junkers v. ChemicalSearch
-
Lange v. WingraveSearch
-
Klein v. PalmerSearch
-
of their vested property. See Cummings v. DeutscheSearch
-
to require repayment of just compensation when the Custodian has liquidated the vested assets. Becker Steel Co. v. CummingsSearch
-
Central Union Trust Co. v. GarvanSearch
-
that friendly aliens are protected by the Fifth Amendment requirement of just compensation. Russian Volunteer Fleet v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 310 -311. On the other side is Mr. Justice (then Judge) Cardozo's careful opinion in Techt v. HughesSearch
-
but he had, of course, no occasion to consider whether this difference attained constitutional dimensions. In Klein v. PalmerSearch
-
against literalness of application. It favors a wise latitude of construction in enforcing its purposes. Cf. Clark v. UeberseeSearch
-
The Government contends that five of these have accepted the position it urges in this case. Schill v. McGrathSearch
-
Lippmann v. McGrathSearch
-
Bellman v. ClarkSearch
-
Mittler v. McGrathSearch
-
Janner v. McGrathSearch
-
the plaintiff there was interned as a dangerous enemy alien during the war. It might also be added that, in McGrath v. ZanderSearch
-
Pillsbury v. UnitedSearch
-
The Court today acknowledges that Techt v. HughesSearch
-
an exhaustive review of the authorities. It should be added that this Court recently adopted the rationale of Techt v. HughesSearch
-
supra, in Johnson v. EisentragerSearch
-
United States v. ChemicalSearch
-
barrier to Ludecke's summary removal without judicial scrutiny under the Enemy Alien Act of 1798. Ludecke v. WatkinsSearch
-
U. S. 160 . That opinion relied upon an excerpt from a paragraph by Chief Justice Marshall in Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 171 . In addition to what was said in Ludecke, the admonition of Chief Justice Marshall in Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
White v. BurnleySearch
-
Herrera v. UnitedSearch
-
S.Rep.No.911, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1941). See Clark v. UeberseeSearch
-
of that power in case of petitioner, an enemy citizen present in an enemy country. In Silesian-American Corp. v. ClarkSearch
-
enemy nation. Unquestionably, to wage war successfully, the United States may confiscate enemy property. United States v. ChemicalSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Guessefeldt v. McGrathSearch
-
See McGrath v. ZanderSearch
-
Becker Steel Co. v. CummingsSearch
-
the United States. Junkers v. ChemicalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial