Citation network
Georgia R. and Banking Co. Vs. Redwine
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 28, 1952
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Georgia R. & Banking Co. v. RedwineSearch
-
U.S. 299 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Georgia R. & Banking Co. v. RedwineSearch
-
U.S. 299 (1952) Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. RedwineSearch
-
in a state court cannot be said to be such a remedy, since it was tried by appellant without success in Musgrove v. GeorgiaSearch
-
was, in effect, an unconsented suit against the State which could not be maintained in the state courts. Musgrove v. GeorgiaSearch
-
acts be adjudged in violation of prior decree also entered by the court below and affirmed by this Court. Wright v. PageSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
for want of jurisdiction, holding that such remedy was not available to appellant. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. RedwineSearch
-
taxation, including cases where, as here, it is alleged that taxation would impair the obligation of contract. Gunter v. AtlanticSearch
-
Allen v. BaltimoreSearch
-
The cases concerning this exemption that have reached this Court are collected in Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. PhillipsSearch
-
Query v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Greene v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Interurban R. Co., 244 U. S. 499 , 244 U. S. 520 (1917), with Matthews v. RodgersSearch
-
U. S. 521 , 284 U. S. 529 -530 (1932). See also Graves v. TexasSearch
-
of the taxes in controversy does not deprive the federal court of jurisdiction over the entire controversy. Greene v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Interurban R. Co., note 10 supra. See Hillsborough v. CromwellSearch
-
Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Eleventh Amendment. Nevertheless, a federal court may not entertain the action if it is a suit against the State. Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
Gunter v. AtlanticSearch
-
Reagan v. Farmers'Search
-
Alabama P.S.C. v. SouthernSearch
-
Greene v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Interurban R. Co., note 10 supra, at 244 U. S. 507 , and cases cited therein. See Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
s allegedly unconstitutional conduct, and does not request affirmative action by the State. Compare Ford Motor Co. v. DepartmentSearch
-
between the decision in Ayers and the cases above cited is shown by the careful differentiation of Allen v. BaltimoreSearch
-
O. R. Co., supra, an opinion also written by Mr. Justice Matthews. See also Pennoyer v. McConnaughySearch
-
to the supreme federal authority. Ex parte Young, supra, at 209 U. S. 167 . See also Graves v. TexasSearch
-
Georgia had submitted itself to the jurisdiction of the District Court in the Wright litigation. Unlike Gunter v. AtlanticSearch
-
in reality, against the Georgia to enjoin a breach of contract. It is the same contract that was involved in Wright v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Page 342 U. S. 307 and the present appellant. There were no special circumstances, as in Land v. DollarSearch
-
of the District Court's equity jurisdiction to protect appellant's rights secured under the prior decree. Gunter v. AtlanticSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Georgia R. & Banking Co. v. RedwineSearch
-
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. RedwineSearch
-
Musgrove v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Court. Wright v. PageSearch
-
Graves v. TexasSearch
-
See Hillsborough v. CromwellSearch
-
the State. Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
See Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
the State. Compare Ford Motor Co. v. DepartmentSearch
-
of Allen v. BaltimoreSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial