Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Standard Oil Co. Vs. Peck

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 04, 1952

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 4 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Morgan Vs. Parham US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1872
    Relied / Followed
  2. Pullman's Palace Car Co. Vs. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court · May 25, 1891
    Relied / Followed
  3. Union Refrigerator Transit Co. Vs. Kentucky US Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1905
  4. Northwest Airlines, Inc. Vs. Minnesota US Supreme Court · May 15, 1944
  5. U.S. 382 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Standard Oil Co. v. Peck
    Search
  6. U.S. 382 (1952) Standard Oil Co. v. Peck
    Search
  7. Under the earlier view governing the taxability of vessels moving in the inland waters, City of St. Louis v. Wiggins
    Search
  8. Ayer & Lord Tie Co. v. Kentucky
    Search
  9. Old Dominion S.S. Co. v. Virginia
    Search
  10. have a strong claim to the whole of the tax that has been levied. But the rationale of those cases was rejected in Ott v. Mississippi
    Search
  11. operations along the inland waters were taxable by the same standards as those which Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  12. may tax the whole value even though the boats and barges operate outside Ohio. New York Central & H.R. R. Co. v. Miller
    Search
  13. so continuously in another state as to be taxable there. 202 U.S. at 202 U. S. 597 . Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Minnesota
    Search
  14. taxable year. But we do know that most, if not all, of them were operating in other waters, and therefore, under Ott v. Mississippi
    Search
  15. of the property by the state of the domicile. See Union Refrigerator Transit Page 342 U. S. 385 Co v. Kentucky
    Search
  16. port and domicile. Seagoing vessels have always been taxable at the domicile of the owner. Southern Pacific Co. v. Kentucky
    Search
  17. Hays v. Pacific
    Search
  18. This same rule has been applied to vessels engaged in commerce between the different states. Transportation Co. v. Wheeling
    Search
  19. City of St. Louis v. Wiggins
    Search
  20. vessels had acquired a situs for taxation in some other state, that other state might tax them. Old Dominion S.S. Co. v. Virginia
    Search
  21. U. S. 299 . In Ayer & Lord Tie Co. v. Kentucky
    Search
  22. The doctrine of apportionment applied in Ott v. Mississippi
    Search
  23. such assurance, there would have been no basis for applying the apportionment rule. New York Central & H.R. R. Co. v. Miller
    Search
  24. law that the state of the owner's domicile is prohibited from taxing under such circumstances. Southern Pacific Co. v. Kentucky
    Search
  25. Northwest Airlines v. Minnesota
    Search
  26. was permitted to tax, irrespective of the amount of time the vessels were present in that state. Southern Pacific Co. v. Kentucky
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Standard Oil Co. v. Peck
    Search
  28. Old Dominion S.S. Co. v. Virginia
    Search
  29. Ott v. Mississippi
    Search
  30. Ohio. New York Central & H.R. R. Co. v. Miller
    Search
  31. Southern Pacific Co. v. Kentucky
    Search
  32. Transportation Co. v. Wheeling
    Search
  33. In Ayer & Lord Tie Co. v. Kentucky
    Search
  34. New York Central & H.R. R. Co. v. Miller
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial