Citation network
Buck Vs. California
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 10, 1952
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 99 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Buck v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. 99 (1952) Buck v. CaliforniaSearch
-
consistently with, the federal regulations and in keeping with the latter's purpose, they may stand together. Kelly v. WashingtonSearch
-
Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. HarrisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Cal.2d 259, 262, 138 P.2d 10. Such delegation by the State to the county has been approved by this Court. Sprout v. SouthSearch
-
in the absence of federal regulation, state regulation is required in the the public interest. Panhandle Pipe Line Co. v. MichiganSearch
-
is an unreasonable burden on foreign commerce in its application to the stipulated facts here. Aero Transit Co. v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Railway Express Agency v. NewSearch
-
Court would not take jurisdiction to pass upon the question. Chief Justice Hughes, speaking for the Court in Lynch v. NewSearch
-
in some way that the regulation is directed toward an incident subject to state control. Cf. Interstate Transit, Inc. v. LindseySearch
-
Clark v. PaulSearch
-
intended Page 343 U. S. 109 to compensate for facilities provided by the state. Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. CommissionersSearch
-
Elgin v. CapitolSearch
-
offered no explanation for its action. The record shows no basis for any conclusion by us. Cf. Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSearch
-
decide that the County is justified in excluding appellants from engaging in foreign commerce in the County. Cf. Smith v. CahoonSearch
-
In comparable situations, this Court has felt the need of greater particularity for adjudication. Rescue Army v. MunicipalSearch
-
the privilege of engaging in foreign commerce could not constitutionally be imposed by San Diego County. Cf. Sprout v. BendSearch
-
U. S. 602 . See Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. CommissionersSearch
-
People v. McKamySearch
-
People v. ReedSearch
-
in amount than is reasonably required to defray the expense of administering the regulations may be demanded.' Sprout v. SouthSearch
-
South Carolina State Highway Department v. BarnwellSearch
-
Bros., Inc., 303 U. S. 177 . Cf. Morf v. BingamanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Buck v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Kelly v. WashingtonSearch
-
Court. Sprout v. SouthSearch
-
Panhandle Pipe Line Co. v. MichiganSearch
-
Aero Transit Co. v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Railway Express Agency v. NewSearch
-
Lynch v. NewSearch
-
Cf. Interstate Transit, Inc. v. LindseySearch
-
Elgin v. CapitolSearch
-
Cf. Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSearch
-
the County. Cf. Smith v. CahoonSearch
-
Rescue Army v. MunicipalSearch
-
San Diego County. Cf. Sprout v. BendSearch
-
See Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
Sprout v. SouthSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial