Citation network
Ray Vs. Blair
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 03, 1952
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 214 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Ray v. BlairSearch
-
U.S. 214 (1952) Ray v. BlairSearch
-
to appoint electors in such manner as it may choose. United States v. ClassicSearch
-
U. S. 299 , and Smith v. AllwrightSearch
-
The requirement of such a pledge does not deny equal protection or due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Nixon v. HerndonSearch
-
generally conformable to the current of authority. Section 347 has been said by the Supreme Court of Alabama in Ray v. GarnerSearch
-
the same pledge that created the controversy in this present case. The court also called attention approvingly to Lett v. DennisSearch
-
prerogative is vested in the State Party Executive Committee, acting through its duly elected or chosen members. Smith v. McQueenSearch
-
the Page 343 U. S. 220 selection of delegates to a national political convention. It was also said in Ray v. GarnerSearch
-
directly to the general election, and is not confined to the primary, it is contended, because, under United States v. ClassicSearch
-
U. S. 649 , 321 U. S. 659 , the Alabama primary is an integral part of the general election. See Schnell v. DavisSearch
-
See Merriam & Overacker, primary Elections (1928), pp. 69-73, 124, 125. Cf. State ex rel. Curyea v. WellsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Francis v. SturgillSearch
-
c. 109, N.D.Laws of 1907, pp. 151, 153, discussed in State ex rel. McCue v. BlaisdellSearch
-
discussed in Mairs v. PetersSearch
-
Ruhr v. CowanSearch
-
See Westerman v. MimsSearch
-
Love v. WilcoxSearch
-
of presidential elector, see the resolutions of the State Democratic Committee of Texas discussed in Carter v. TomlinsonSearch
-
Love v. TaylorSearch
-
McDonald v. CalhounSearch
-
Seay v. LathamSearch
-
Tex. 1, 182 S.W.2d 251. See also the pledge required by the Democratic Party of Arkansas, discussed in Fisher v. TaylorSearch
-
Similar pledges, of course, are frequently exacted of voters in the primaries. See, e.g., State ex rel. Adair v. DrexelSearch
-
Morrow v. WipfSearch
-
Ladd v. HolmesSearch
-
See Seay v. LathamSearch
-
Tex. at 5, 182 S.W.2d at 253. See Carter v. TomlinsonSearch
-
Id. 250 Ala. at 400, 34 So.2d at 600. See McPherson v. BlackerSearch
-
in the arrangement by which presidential electors were chosen by the state as its legislature might direct. McPherson v. BlackerSearch
-
Burroughs v. UnitedSearch
-
the Democratic Party of that state was thus affiliated with the national organization. See the excerpt from Ray v. GarnerSearch
-
of color, as we have pointed out before, is not reasonably related to any legitimate legislative objective. Nixon v. HerndonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ray v. BlairSearch
-
and Smith v. AllwrightSearch
-
the Fourteenth Amendment. Nixon v. HerndonSearch
-
Ray v. GarnerSearch
-
Lett v. DennisSearch
-
Smith v. McQueenSearch
-
See Schnell v. DavisSearch
-
Curyea v. WellsSearch
-
McCue v. BlaisdellSearch
-
Mairs v. PetersSearch
-
Love v. WilcoxSearch
-
Carter v. TomlinsonSearch
-
Love v. TaylorSearch
-
Seay v. LathamSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial