Citation network
Johansen Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 26, 1952
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Johansen v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 343 U.S. 427 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Johansen v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 343 U.S. 427 (1952) Johansen v. UnitedSearch
-
by the 1949 amendments to the Federal Employees Compensation Act. Pp. 343 U. S. 431 -111. 3. United States v. MarineSearch
-
F.2d 456, and Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
remedy. The Court recognized that its decision conflicted on this point with a decision of the Fourth Circuit, Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
defense based on the Compensation Act. Recognizing conflict with the decision of the Fourth Circuit in United States v. MarineSearch
-
F.2d 456, as well as Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
caused by the negligent maintenance or operation of a public vessel of the United States. American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSearch
-
U. S. 446 , cf. Canadian Aviator, Ltd. v. UnitedSearch
-
Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
injuries received in Government employment. Actually it was the only, and therefore the exclusive, remedy. See Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
to seamen on public vessels. An extension of this nature was proposed, but defeated. See Canadian Aviator, Ltd. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
affect consideration of whether petitioners' sole remedy is under the Federal Employees Compensation Act. Cf. Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
of the remedy against the United States under the Federal Employees Compensation Act. This Court, in Dahn v. DavisSearch
-
Federal Employees Compensation Act. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Hines v. DahnSearch
-
United States v. MarineSearch
-
a case allowing recovery to a civilian employee of the Government under the Suits in Admiralty Act, and Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
sovereign immunity, in the absence of specific exceptions, would naturally be regarded as exclusive. See United States v. ShawSearch
-
This Court accepted the principle of the exclusive character of federal plans for compensation in Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
would contribute neither to uniformity nor to fairness. See Mandel v. UnitedSearch
-
Together with No. 414, Mandel, Administrator v. UnitedSearch
-
See Posey v. TennesseeSearch
-
Parr v. UnitedSearch
-
Thomason v. WorksSearch
-
White v. TennesseeSearch
-
Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
O'Neal v. UnitedSearch
-
Lopez v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. LoyolaSearch
-
F.2d 126. See Bradey v. UnitedSearch
-
Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. AultSearch
-
It is suggested that Brady v. RooseveltSearch
-
damages against private operators, not the Government. 317 U.S. at 317 U. S. 577 . Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSearch
-
Public Vessels Act, 43 Stat. 1112. See Keifer & Keifer v. ReconstructionSearch
-
Bradey v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 151 F.2d 742. See Dobson v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 186 F.2d 120. In Gibbs v. UnitedSearch
-
review of court decisions, it can be categorically stated that no federal court decision, other than the case of Posey v. TennesseeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Johansen v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MarineSearch
-
and Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Fourth Circuit, Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
of the United States. American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSearch
-
Canadian Aviator, Ltd. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Johnson v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial