Citation network
Casey Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 09, 1952
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
Casey v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 343 U.S. 808 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Casey v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 343 U.S. 808 (1952) Casey v. UnitedSearch
-
cause of the litigant. The practice in cases in which the Solicitor General confesses error was settled by Young v. UnitedSearch
-
to great weight, but our judicial obligations compel us to examine independently the errors confessed. See Parlton v. UnitedSearch
-
and the proper administration of the criminal law cannot be left merely to the stipulation of parties. Cf. Rex v. WilkesSearch
-
State v. GreenSearch
-
The principles announced in Young v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, were expressly reaffirmed in Gibson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 329 U. S. 338 , 329 U. S. 344 , cf. Marino v. RagenSearch
-
complain of the search. That ruling is questionable in view of the intervening decision of this Court in United States v. JeffersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of search and seizure. The facts are not in dispute. The only question is the reach of our decision in Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
During the same term of Court as Young v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, the Government also confessed error in Weber v. UnitedSearch
-
In Upshaw v. UnitedSearch
-
confessed error in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. That court, adhering to its precedent in Parlton v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 64 App.D.C. 169, 75 F.2d 772 (1935), cited with approval in Young v. UnitedSearch
-
Cates v. HaderleinSearch
-
Chiarella v. UnitedSearch
-
Ryles v. UnitedSearch
-
Bellaskus v. CrossmanSearch
-
Fogel v. UnitedSearch
-
Wixman v. UnitedSearch
-
Mogall v. UnitedSearch
-
General does not oppose the granting of a petition for certiorari is entitled to respect, see, e.g., Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSearch
-
automatically grant certiorari because of the Government's consent to such action. E.g., Community Services, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Dollar v. UnitedSearch
-
being that the methods of expatriation listed in the Nationality Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 1168, were exclusive. Kawakita v. UnitedSearch
-
of affirmance being that methods of expatriation listed in the Nationality Act of 1940 were not exclusive. Mandoli v. AchesonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Casey v. UnitedSearch
-
Young v. UnitedSearch
-
See Parlton v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Rex v. WilkesSearch
-
Gibson v. UnitedSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Weber v. UnitedSearch
-
Parlton v. UnitedSearch
-
E.g., Community Services, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Kawakita v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial