Citation network
Nathanson Vs. Labor Board
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 10, 1952
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Nathanson v. LaborSearch
-
Board - 344 U.S. 25 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Nathanson v. LaborSearch
-
Board, 344 U.S. 25 (1952) Nathanson v. LaborSearch
-
a)(2). Bramwell v. UnitedSearch
-
for certiorari was granted because of a conflict on the question of priority between that decision and Labor Board v. KillorenSearch
-
The Board is the public agent chosen by Congress to enforce the National Labor Relations Act. Amalgamated Workers v. EdisonSearch
-
statute by making the employees whole for losses suffered on account of an unfair labor practice. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Act. See Brown v. O'KeefeSearch
-
See United States v. StateSearch
-
the public revenue. The beneficiaries of the claims are private persons, as was the receiver in American Surety Co. v. AkronSearch
-
Savings Bank, 212 U.S. 557. It is true that Bramwell v. UnitedSearch
-
States for Indian moneys. But that case rests on the status of the Indians as wards of the United States, see Bowling v. UnitedSearch
-
S. 528 , and the continuing responsibility which it has for the protection of their interests. See United States v. RickertSearch
-
Board of Commissioners v. SeberSearch
-
priority to a claim which the United States is collecting for the benefit of a private party. See American Surety Co. v. AkronSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Sampsell v. ImperialSearch
-
from the labor market, whether the employee received equivalent employment, and the like. See Phelps Dodge Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
as its agent for the purpose. The bankruptcy court normally supervises the liquidation of claims. See Gardner v. NewSearch
-
may indicate that a particular controversy should be remitted to another tribunal for litigation. See Thompson v. MagnoliaSearch
-
the bankruptcy court normally should stay its hand pending an administrative decision. That was our ruling in Smith v. HobokenSearch
-
R. Co., 328 U. S. 123 , and Thompson v. TexasSearch
-
Act as analogous to the Government's wardship toward Indians, found to warrant invocation of its priority in Bramwell v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Nathanson v. LaborSearch
-
Bramwell v. UnitedSearch
-
and Labor Board v. KillorenSearch
-
the National Labor Relations Act. Amalgamated Workers v. EdisonSearch
-
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
of the Bankruptcy Act. See Brown v. O'KeefeSearch
-
American Surety Co. v. AkronSearch
-
Bowling v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. RickertSearch
-
See American Surety Co. v. AkronSearch
-
See Phelps Dodge Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
See Gardner v. NewSearch
-
See Thompson v. MagnoliaSearch
-
Smith v. HobokenSearch
-
and Thompson v. TexasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial