Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Schwartz Vs. Texas

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 15, 1952

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 2 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Reid Vs. Colorado US Supreme Court · Dec 01, 1902
  2. Wolf Vs. Colorado US Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1949
  3. U.S. 199 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Schwartz v. Texas
    Search
  4. U.S. 199 (1952) Schwartz v. Texas
    Search
  5. in a court of the United States communications intercepted and sought to be divulged in violation thereof, Nardone v. United
    Search
  6. U. S. 379 , and this is true even though the communications were intrastate telephone calls. Weiss v. United
    Search
  7. and seizure under the Fourth Amendment to the Federal Constitution is nonetheless admissible in a state court, Wolf v. Colorado
    Search
  8. while such evidence, if obtained by a federal officer, would be clearly inadmissible in a federal court. Weeks v. United
    Search
  9. does not apply to exclude such communications from evidence in state courts. Leon v. State
    Search
  10. People v. Stemmer
    Search
  11. Harlem Check Cashing Corp. v. Bell
    Search
  12. People v. Channell
    Search
  13. S.F. R. Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  14. Commission, 283 U. S. 380 , 283 U. S. 392 -393. See Savage v. Jones
    Search
  15. deems a violation of the United States Constitution, the problem is, or might be, different. See State Tax Commission v. Van
    Search
  16. was admitted here would, in my view, render it inadmissible in a federal prosecution, see my dissent in On Lee v. United
    Search
  17. Court's authority. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. Since, in my view, (as indicated in my dissent in On Lee v. United
    Search
  18. by it should have been excluded. The question whether the Fourth Amendment is applicable to the states, see Wolf v. Colorado
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court Schwartz v. Texas
    Search
  20. Nardone v. United
    Search
  21. Weiss v. United
    Search
  22. Weeks v. United
    Search
  23. Leon v. State
    Search
  24. S.F. R. Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  25. See Savage v. Jones
    Search
  26. See State Tax Commission v. Van
    Search
  27. On Lee v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial