Citation network
Steele Vs. Bulova Watch Co., Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 22, 1952
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Steele v. BulovaSearch
-
Watch Co., Inc. - 344 U.S. 280 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Steele v. BulovaSearch
-
Watch Co., Inc., 344 U.S. 280 (1952) Steele v. BulovaSearch
-
in isolation, did not violate any law of the United States. P. 344 U. S. 287 . (b) American Banana Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
may project the impact of its laws beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States. Cf. Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSearch
-
Blackmer v. UnitedSearch
-
Branch v. FederalSearch
-
not extend beyond the boundaries of the United States unless a contrary legislative intent appears. E.g., Blackmer v. UnitedSearch
-
of legislative policy by the Government itself or by private litigants proceeding under a statutory right. Thomsen v. CayserSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Mandeville Island Farms v. AmericanSearch
-
Vermilya-Brown Co. v. ConnellSearch
-
George W. Luft Co. v. ZandeSearch
-
Hecker H-O Co. v. HollandSearch
-
Vacuum Oil Co. v. EagleSearch
-
Oil Co., 154 F. 867 (1907), aff'd, 162 F. 671 (1908). Cf. Morris v. AltstedterSearch
-
acts in themselves legal lose that character when they become part of an unlawful scheme. United States v. BauschSearch
-
United States v. UnivisSearch
-
Crystal Sugar Co., 334 U. S. 219 , 334 U. S. 237 (1948). Cf. United States v. FrankfortSearch
-
of the United States in a privileged sanctuary beyond our borders. Page 344 U. S. 288 American Banana Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
this Court held as much in Thomsen v. CayserSearch
-
U. S. 66 (1917), and United States v. SisalSearch
-
may command persons properly before it to cease or perform acts outside its territorial jurisdiction. New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
United States v. NationalSearch
-
matter of this suit, we do not stop to consider the significance, if any, of those averments. Cf. Pecheur Lozenge Co. v. NationalSearch
-
For able Court of Appeals discussions of the impact of Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
U. S. 64 (1938), on the law prior and subsequent to the Lanham Act, see Dad's Root Beer Co. v. Doc'sSearch
-
S.C. Johnson & Son v. JohnsonSearch
-
Campbell Soup Co. v. ArmourSearch
-
Stauffer v. ExleySearch
-
F.2d 962 (1950). See also National Fruit Product Co. v. Dwinell-WrightSearch
-
Sidney Steele v. SecretarySearch
-
United States Printing & Lithograph Co. v. GriggsSearch
-
Pure Oil Co. v. PuritanSearch
-
See Vacuum Oil Co. v. EagleSearch
-
United States v. AluminumSearch
-
Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416, 443-444 (1945). Cf. Ford v. UnitedSearch
-
Lamar v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Cole v. CunnighamSearch
-
Securities and Exchange Commission v. MinasSearch
-
British Nylon Spinners, Ltd. v. ImperialSearch
-
a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, Blackmer v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Steele v. BulovaSearch
-
American Banana Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
of the United States. Cf. Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial