Citation network
United States Vs. ChamplIn Refining Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 07, 1951
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
United States v. ChamplinSearch
-
Refining Co. - 341 U.S. 290 (1951) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ChamplinSearch
-
Refining Co., 341 U.S. 290 (1951) United States v. ChamplinSearch
-
or other pipeline company has requested a connection with appellee. In an earlier proceeding, Champlin Refining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Champlin Refining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
independent statutory issue on a proper record. The reasons for this approach were suggested in Valvoline Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Pipe Line Cases, supra, at 334 U. S. 560 . And see Valvoline Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
That definition was held in Champlin Refining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 548 , 234 U. S. 561 -562, and the view expressed in the dissent in Champlin Refining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
at in the Pipe Line Cases, 234 U. S. 548 (where this section was involved), nor in Valvoline Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
nor in our decision in the first Champlin case, Champlin Rfg. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
so. I would not overrule either. Nor do I understand how today's holding can be reconciled with Valvoline Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
between the same parties unless there is a departure from the principles most recently announced in United States v. MunsingwearSearch
-
the Munsingwear principle when the effect (as distinguished from the language) of their decision is considered. V WhySearch
-
Pierce Oil Corp. v. PhoenixSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
held that subsequent minor modifications changed neither the purpose nor the meaning of the Act. Valvoline Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Champlin Rfg. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Pipe Line as a Common Carrier, 32 Cornell L.Q. 337, 341. For history of Standard Oil practices, see Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. StandardSearch
-
As to the danger involved in interpreting this Act as aimed at a single corporation, see McFarland v. AmericanSearch
-
United States v. ElginSearch
-
United States v. SouthSearch
-
does not appear in the record. But the exact number cannot have legal significance here. See Valvoline Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Enid refinery than is Superior. The effect of such control was pointed out long ago by this Court in Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ChamplinSearch
-
Valvoline Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MunsingwearSearch
-
of the Act. Valvoline Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
McFarland v. AmericanSearch
-
United States v. ElginSearch
-
See Valvoline Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial