Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Hoffman Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 28, 1951

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 2 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Hale Vs. Henkel US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1906
  2. Counselman Vs. Hitchcock US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1892
  3. Hoffman v. United
    Search
  4. States - 341 U.S. 479 (1951) U.S. Supreme Court Hoffman v. United
    Search
  5. States, 341 U.S. 479 (1951) Hoffman v. United
    Search
  6. those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a federal crime. Blau v. United
    Search
  7. Feldman v. United
    Search
  8. of the Amendment must be accorded liberal construction in favor of the right it was intended to secure. Counselman v. Hitchcock
    Search
  9. would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a federal crime. (Patricia) Blau v. United
    Search
  10. must be confined to instances where the witness has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer. Mason v. United
    Search
  11. of itself establish the hazard of incrimination. It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United
    Search
  12. Temple v. Commonwealth
    Search
  13. to incriminate. Temple v. Commonwealth
    Search
  14. Va. 892, 898 (1880), cited with approval in Counselman v. Hitchcock
    Search
  15. U. S. 547 , 142 U. S. 579 -580. Page 341 U. S. 489 See also Arndstein v. McCarthy
    Search
  16. a power which courts should be solicitous to invoke when important constitutional objections are renewed. Cf. Gouled v. United
    Search
  17. United States v. White
    Search
  18. U. S. 698 (1944). Pertinent here is the observation of Mr. Justice Brandeis for this Court in McCarthy v. Arndstein
    Search
  19. Patricia) Blau v. United
    Search
  20. Irving) Blau v. United
    Search
  21. Rogers v. United
    Search
  22. Greenberg v. United
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Hoffman v. United
    Search
  24. Blau v. United
    Search
  25. Mason v. United
    Search
  26. Cf. Gouled v. United
    Search
  27. Arndstein v. McCarthy
    Search
  28. McCarthy v. Arndstein
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial