Citation network
Bindczyck Vs. Funicane
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 26, 1951
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 76 (1951) U.S. Supreme Court Bindczyck v. FunicaneSearch
-
U.S. 76 (1951) Bindczyck v. FunicaneSearch
-
the finality of local judgments. Pp. 342 U. S. 79 -86. (b) A different result is not required by Tutun v. UnitedSearch
-
the views of the court below and those of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in United States ex rel. Volpe v. JordanSearch
-
left open the question whether a court of equity had such power without express legislative authority. Johannessen v. UnitedSearch
-
citizenship before 1906 was not always surrounded by the safeguards of an original equity proceeding. See, e.g., Tinn v. UnitedSearch
-
the Government had recourse to appeal for examination of the action of the naturalizing court on the record. Tutun v. UnitedSearch
-
was found not to prevent the taking of appeals from a naturalization order, Tutun v. UnitedSearch
-
See Eddy v. SummersSearch
-
a judgment does not come into being until a defined period or event after a decision is rendered. Compare Commissioner v. EstateSearch
-
a term, in general, ends only at the commencement of the next succeeding term held at the same place. See, e.g., Comes v. ComesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Hensley v. StateSearch
-
Maryland (Baltimore City Court) -- See Harvey v. SlacumSearch
-
Nevada -- See Lauer v. EighthSearch
-
it appears, a court has no control over its judgments after they are signed and entered. See, e.g., Louisiana Bank v. HamptonSearch
-
Nelson & Co. v. RocquetSearch
-
except for clerical error. Shawmut Commercial Paper Co. v. CramSearch
-
Joy v. YoungSearch
-
of an issued certificate. It is settled law, however, that appeals are allowable from federal and state courts. Tutun v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. SangesSearch
-
Cf. Stark v. WickardSearch
-
See Johannessen v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. NessSearch
-
Henderson v. CarbondaleSearch
-
Zimmern v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 298 U. S. 167 . See Eddy v. SummersSearch
-
Wright v. VintonSearch
-
Cf. United States v. AmericanSearch
-
Volpe v. JordanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Bindczyck v. FunicaneSearch
-
Tutun v. UnitedSearch
-
Volpe v. JordanSearch
-
Johannessen v. UnitedSearch
-
Tinn v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Commissioner v. EstateSearch
-
Comes v. ComesSearch
-
See Harvey v. SlacumSearch
-
See Lauer v. EighthSearch
-
Louisiana Bank v. HamptonSearch
-
Shawmut Commercial Paper Co. v. CramSearch
-
Goddard v. OrdwaySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial