Citation network
Stefanelli Vs. Minard
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 03, 1951
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 117 (1951) U.S. Supreme Court Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
U.S. 117 (1951) Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
is admissible without regard to the illegality of its procurement. Petitioners invoke our decision in Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
requirement, bearing on a Page 342 U. S. 121 State's enforcement of its criminal law. E.g., Watson v. BuckSearch
-
Beal v. MissouriSearch
-
Spielman Motor Co. v. DodgeSearch
-
It has received striking confirmation even where an important countervailing federal interest was involved. Maryland v. SoperSearch
-
Screws v. UnitedSearch
-
prosecution is Page 342 U. S. 122 one of the devices we have sanctioned for preserving this balance. Douglas v. CitySearch
-
relief in equity even when recognizing that comparable facts would create a cause of action for damages. Compare Giles v. HarrisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 475 , with Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
U. S. 268 . In Douglas v. CitySearch
-
in the New Jersey courts. Such a conviction, we have held, would not deprive them of due process of law. Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
Hague v. CIOSearch
-
We recently commented on the circumstances surrounding the enactment of this legislation in United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
U. S. 70 , 341 U. S. 74 , and Collins v. HardymanSearch
-
In these respects, the case differs from Hague v. CIOSearch
-
Douglas v. CitySearch
-
Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
Hurn v. OurslerSearch
-
See Smith v. TexasSearch
-
See Strauder v. WestSearch
-
See Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
See Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
See Moore v. DempseySearch
-
See Townsend v. BurkeSearch
-
of a biased jury and subjected her to a fraudulent trial resulting in a conviction reversed on appeal. McShane v. MoldovanSearch
-
Picking v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
arrest and detention in violation of the Uniform Extradition Act sustained against motion to dismiss). But see Campo v. NiemeyerSearch
-
Lyons v. BakerSearch
-
Bottone v. LindsleySearch
-
Mitchell v. GreenoughSearch
-
Llano Del Rio Co. v. Anderson-PostSearch
-
that particular phases of criminal proceedings are unfair. The lower courts have refused to intervene. Cooper v. HutchinsonSearch
-
Ackerman v. InternationalSearch
-
McGuire v. AmreinSearch
-
Erickson v. HoganSearch
-
Refoule v. EllisSearch
-
Eastus v. BradshawSearch
-
F.2d 788. And see Hoffman v. O'BrienSearch
-
controversy. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. Mr. Justice Murphy, Mr. Justice Rutledge, and I voted in Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
E.g., Watson v. BuckSearch
-
Compare Giles v. HarrisSearch
-
Lane v. WilsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial