Citation network
Fpc Vs. East Ohio Gas Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 09, 1950
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
FPC v. EastSearch
-
Ohio Gas Co. - 338 U.S. 464 (1950) U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. EastSearch
-
Ohio Gas Co., 338 U.S. 464 (1950) Federal Power Commission v. EastSearch
-
As we held in Interstate Natural Gas Co. v. FederalSearch
-
b) itself. As we pointed out in Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
-
See also Public Utilities Comm'n of Ohio v. PageSearch
-
would decide today, form the measure of the gap which Congress intended to close by this Act. Illinois Natural Gas Co. v. CentralSearch
-
Illinois Public Service Co., 314 U. S. 498 , 314 U. S. 508 , and see Parker v. MotorSearch
-
interstate gas only after it was reduced in pressure and entered a local distribution system. Public Utilities Comm'n v. LandonSearch
-
Public Utilities Comm'n v. AttleboroSearch
-
Steam & Electric Co., 273 U. S. 83 , 273 U. S. 89 , and see East Ohio Gas Co. v. TaxSearch
-
a company transporting interstate gas, and selling it for resale, wholly within one state. Illinois Natural Gas Co. v. CentralSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
would not preclude Page 338 U. S. 474 exercise of the Commission's function. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. FederalSearch
-
were adequately set out by Mr. Justice Cardozo, speaking for the Court, in American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 299 U. S. 232 . See also Northwestern Electric Co. v. FederalSearch
-
rights of the states under the Tenth Amendment is foreclosed by the Court's holding in Northwestern Electric Co. v. FederalSearch
-
East Ohio Gas Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Colorado-Wyoming Gas Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Illinois Natural Gas Co. v. CentralSearch
-
Illinois Public Service Co., 314 U. S. 498 , 314 U. S. 503 -504. See also East Ohio Gas Co. v. TaxSearch
-
that which we held to bring oil transportation within the coverage of the Interstate Commerce Act. Valvoline Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Champlin Refining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In both Public Utilities Comm'n v. LandonSearch
-
U. S. 236 , 249 U. S. 245 , and Pennsylvania Gas Co. v. PublicSearch
-
state regulation because retail sales presented a problem of local, rather than national concern. In Missouri v. KansasSearch
-
the Landon principle that states could regulate charges for service to local consumers. Public Utilities Comm'n v. AttleboroSearch
-
a company which, like East Ohio, transmitted its product (electricity) wholly within one state. In East Ohio Gas Co. v. TaxSearch
-
the absence of federal legislation, regulate such a company as Illinois Gas or East Ohio. See Illinois Natural Gas Co. v. CentralSearch
-
Public Service Co., 314 U. S. 498 , 314 U. S. 504 , discussed in Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Service Comm'n, 332 U. S. 507 , 332 U. S. 512 . But compare H. P. Hood & Sons v. DuMondSearch
-
each state was able to regulate the ultimate price of natural gas distributed to its consumers. Pennsylvania Gas Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Public Utilities Comm'n v. UnitedSearch
-
Federal Power Comm'n v. HopeSearch
-
Interstate Natural Gas Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Federal Power Comm'n v. PanhandleSearch
-
within current judicial decisions in the absence of evidence which makes such intention unmistakable. United States v. South-EasternSearch
-
no effort to look for evidence of such an intention, and, had it searched, it would not have found it. Cf. Helvering v. GriffithsSearch
-
Parker v. MotorSearch
-
cases relating to regulation, but the peculiarly mechanistic formula employed principally in 1931 in East Ohio Gas Co. v. TaxSearch
-
either by the then current decisions as to limitations of the Commerce Clause on state power, cf. United States v. South-EasternSearch
-
wholesale and retail distribution less than half a year after the East Ohio tax decision. State Tax Comm'n v. InterstateSearch
-
as those of East Ohio. However, this pressure factor is one which we found immaterial in Interstate Natural Gas Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Comm'nSearch
-
not intrude. The former included interstate direct sales to local consumers, as exemplified in Pennsylvania Gas Co. v. PublicSearch
-
service interstate to local distributing companies for resale, Page 338 U. S. 483 as held in Missouri v. KansasSearch
-
Natural Gas Co., 265 U. S. 298 , reinforced by Public Utilities Comm'n v. AttleboroSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. EastSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial