Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Wissner Vs. Wissner

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 06, 1950

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 2 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Ruddy Vs. Rossi US Supreme Court · Dec 09, 1918
  2. United States Vs. Malcolm US Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1931
  3. U.S. 655 (1950) U.S. Supreme Court Wissner v. Wissner
    Search
  4. U.S. 655 (1950) Wissner v. Wissner
    Search
  5. pensions and veterans' relief do not apply when alimony or the support of wife or children is in issue. See Schlaefer v. Schlaefer
    Search
  6. Tully v. Tully
    Search
  7. Hodson v. New
    Search
  8. In re Guardianship of Bagnall, 238 Iowa 905, 29 N.W.2d 597 (1947), and cases therein cited. But cf. Brewer v. Brewer
    Search
  9. congressional powers over national defense, and the means are adapted to the chosen end. The Act is valid. McCulloch v. Maryland
    Search
  10. of nongovernmental insurance under California law, that rule cannot apply to this insurance. Compare W. B. Worthen Co. v. Thomas
    Search
  11. Lynch v. United
    Search
  12. States, 292 U. S. 571 (1934). See Hines v. Lowrey
    Search
  13. Norman v. Baltimore
    Search
  14. We assume the correctness of the lower court's statement of state law. See also French v. French
    Search
  15. California Civil Code. The wife has a vested interest in one-half of such earnings. United States v. Malcolm
    Search
  16. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Assn. v. Mantz
    Search
  17. Cooke v. Cooke
    Search
  18. Page 338 U. S. 662 the wife's consent, the wife could claim her proportionate share of the insurance. Grimm v. Grimm
    Search
  19. Bazzell v. Endriss
    Search
  20. Mundt v. Connecticut
    Search
  21. Schlaefer v. Schlaefer
    Search
  22. App.D.C. 350, 112 F.2d 177. See also Gaskins v. Security-First
    Search
  23. Hollis v. Bryan
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Wissner v. Wissner
    Search
  25. See Schlaefer v. Schlaefer
    Search
  26. Brewer v. Brewer
    Search
  27. McCulloch v. Maryland
    Search
  28. Compare W. B. Worthen Co. v. Thomas
    Search
  29. See Hines v. Lowrey
    Search
  30. French v. French
    Search
  31. Grimm v. Grimm
    Search
  32. Gaskins v. Security-First
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales