Citation network
Cassell Vs. Texas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 24, 1950
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 282 (1950) U.S. Supreme Court Cassell v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. 282 (1950) Cassell v. TexasSearch
-
who were eligible and available for grand jury service. It also appeared from that record that, from 1942, when Hill v. TexasSearch
-
and this action was sustained by the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas in affirming petitioner's conviction. Cassell v. StateSearch
-
of the laws when he is indicted by a grand jury from which Negroes as a race have been intentionally excluded. Cassell v. StateSearch
-
Smith v. TexasSearch
-
Hill v. TexasSearch
-
weighing this matter of custom, we limit ourselves, as do the parties, to the period between June 1, 1942, when Hill v. TexasSearch
-
so here, and the result has been racial discrimination. We repeat the recent statement of Chief Justice Stone in Hill v. TexasSearch
-
Fay v. NewSearch
-
Harper v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
supra, p. 311 U. S. 130 . See Zimmerman v. StateSearch
-
A.2d 675, 676-677, affirmed under title Zimmerman v. MarylandSearch
-
Conklin v. StateSearch
-
Compare Norris v. AlabamaSearch
-
Cassell v. StateSearch
-
See Neal v. DelawareSearch
-
In large centers, methods of selection other than personal acquaintanceship have been found convenient. Fay v. NewSearch
-
There was a further discussion of the duty of jury commissioners to familiarize themselves with jury eligibles in Hill v. StateSearch
-
which is based on an indictment found by a grand jury from which Negroes were kept because of discrimination. Neal v. DelawareSearch
-
in this Page 339 U. S. 291 context means purposeful, systematic noninclusion because of color. Hill v. TexasSearch
-
political unit from which a grand jury is drawn or an isolated instance of disparity among such components. Akins v. TexasSearch
-
to the ultimate issue of discrimination is precisely the constitutional issue on which this Court must pass. See Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
I believe to be the real situation on the record before us. The governing facts are briefly stated. In Hill v. TexasSearch
-
on the Page 339 U. S. 294 panel -- for the second grand jury in Dallas County after the decision in Hill v. TexasSearch
-
Again, as to the grand jury which figured in Akins v. TexasSearch
-
one Negro was placed on the list, and he served as a grand juror. 325 U.S. at 325 U. S. 405 . And in Weems v. StateSearch
-
that one Negro on the grand jury satisfied the prohibition against discrimination in Page 339 U. S. 295 Hill v. TexasSearch
-
by this Court with respect to such exclusion. I am unable to conclude that, from the date of the decision in Hill v. TexasSearch
-
notice is taken of the racial composition of three lists during the period in question, which are reported in Akins v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cassell v. TexasSearch
-
See Zimmerman v. StateSearch
-
Zimmerman v. MarylandSearch
-
Hill v. StateSearch
-
See Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
In Hill v. TexasSearch
-
Weems v. StateSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial