Citation network
Mcgrath Vs. Kristensen
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 11, 1950
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 162 (1950) U.S. Supreme Court McGrath v. KristensenSearch
-
U.S. 162 (1950) McGrath v. KristensenSearch
-
the Attorney General is given final power to suspend deportation for at least six months. Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. WatermanSearch
-
may be determined by a declaratory judgment proceeding after the exhaustion of administrative remedies. Perkins v. ElgSearch
-
immigration and naturalization laws. The principle of the decision below is in conflict with that applied in Benzian v. GodwinSearch
-
other steps does not detract from that finality. The United States relies particularly on Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. WatermanSearch
-
It was so held in Perkins v. ElgSearch
-
Elg was a citizen, and also determined that the case was properly brought within the Declaratory Judgment Act. Perkins v. ElgSearch
-
properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants ( Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford v. HaworthSearch
-
comment e . See Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
a) of the Act. See the opinion of Judge Frank in Benzian v. GodwinSearch
-
Muskrat v. UnitedSearch
-
Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. WatermanSearch
-
Cf. Gordon v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. JeffersonSearch
-
King Iron Bridge & Mfg. Co. v. CountySearch
-
of ineligibility for citizenship has administrative finality. Administrative remedies are exhausted. Compare Levers v. AndersonSearch
-
Mabler v. EbySearch
-
U. S. 33 . Cf. Gusik v. SchilderSearch
-
Estep v. UnitedSearch
-
Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford v. HaworthSearch
-
United States v. WestSearch
-
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesSearch
-
Cf. Benzian v. GodwinSearch
-
Benzian v. GodwinSearch
-
Neuberger v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 13 F.2d 541, 542. Cf. Stadtmuller v. MillerSearch
-
difficult to explain in view of the fact that he personally had urged this history upon this Court in arguing Perkins v. ElgSearch
-
recanting views he Page 340 U. S. 178 had pressed upon the Court as Attorney General of Maryland in Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
Andrew v. StyrapSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court McGrath v. KristensenSearch
-
the Declaratory Judgment Act. Perkins v. ElgSearch
-
See Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Levers v. AndersonSearch
-
Cf. Gusik v. SchilderSearch
-
Cf. Stadtmuller v. MillerSearch
-
Brown v. MarylandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial