Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Kovacs Vs. Cooper

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 31, 1949

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

52 entries 12 linked 40 unlinked
Show
  1. Cantwell Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · May 20, 1940
  2. Sage Stores Co. Vs. Kansas US Supreme Court · Nov 06, 1944
  3. Hutchinson Ice Cream Co. Vs. Iowa US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1916
  4. Powell Vs. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court · Apr 09, 1888
  5. Mugler Vs. Kansas US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 1887
  6. Buttfield Vs. Stranahan US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1904
  7. Prince Vs. Massachusetts US Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1944
  8. Murdock Vs. Pennsylvania US Supreme Court · May 03, 1943
  9. Whitney Vs. California US Supreme Court · May 16, 1927
  10. Schneider Vs. State US Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1939
  11. Thomas Vs. Collins US Supreme Court · Jan 08, 1945
  12. United States Vs. Cio US Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1948
  13. U.S. 77 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court Kovacs v. Cooper
    Search
  14. U.S. 77 (1949) Kovacs v. Cooper
    Search
  15. the appellee, a police judge of the City of Trenton. His conviction was upheld by the New Jersey Supreme Court, Kovacs v. Cooper
    Search
  16. Winters v. New
    Search
  17. Saia v. New
    Search
  18. that reasonable interpretation of a statute which removes it farthest from possible constitutional infirmity. Cox v. New
    Search
  19. United States v. CIO
    Search
  20. It was said decades ago in an opinion of this Court delivered by Mr. Justice Holmes, Schenck v. United
    Search
  21. The Court never intimated that the visitor could insert a foot in the door and insist on a hearing. Martin v. Struthers
    Search
  22. so as to require federal intervention to protect a citizen from the action of his own local government. Cf. Palko v. Connecticut
    Search
  23. Lovell v. City
    Search
  24. New Orleans Water Works Co. v. New
    Search
  25. Ordinances regulating or prohibiting sound devices were upheld in People v. Phillips
    Search
  26. Maupin v. City
    Search
  27. Hamilton v. City
    Search
  28. Injunctions have also dealt with nuisances from the playing of mechanical music for advertising purposes. Weber v. Mann
    Search
  29. Stodder v. Rosen
    Search
  30. Hague v. CIO
    Search
  31. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Drainage
    Search
  32. Nebbia v. New
    Search
  33. Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. Saxl
    Search
  34. The Court of Errors and Appeals was cognizant of the difficulties. Evening Times Printing Co. v. American
    Search
  35. Cox v. New
    Search
  36. from use may be prohibited under some conditions and circumstances when they interfere with the rights of others. Cox v. New
    Search
  37. Chaplinsky v. New
    Search
  38. U. S. 623 , 123 U. S. 657 -663. For examples of federal prohibitions, see Carolene Products Co. v. United
    Search
  39. Kentucky Whip Collar Co. v. Illinois
    Search
  40. Reynolds v. United
    Search
  41. See Schneider v. State
    Search
  42. U.S. Supreme Court Kovacs v. Cooper
    Search
  43. the New Jersey Supreme Court, Kovacs v. Cooper
    Search
  44. Mr. Justice Holmes, Schenck v. United
    Search
  45. Martin v. Struthers
    Search
  46. Cf. Palko v. Connecticut
    Search
  47. People v. Phillips
    Search
  48. Weber v. Mann
    Search
  49. Evening Times Printing Co. v. American
    Search
  50. Carolene Products Co. v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial