Citation network
Callaway Vs. Benton
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 07, 1949
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 132 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court Callaway v. BentonSearch
-
U.S. 132 (1949) Callaway v. BentonSearch
-
Pp. 336 U. S. 146 -148. 3. In the circumstances of this case, Continental Illinois Bank v. ChicagoSearch
-
Group of Institutional Investors v. ChicagoSearch
-
reorganization proceedings, see United States v. LowdenSearch
-
intended to leave to individual judges the question of whether state laws should be accepted or disregarded, Palmer v. MassachusettsSearch
-
of bankruptcy has exclusive and nondelegable control over the administration of an estate in its possession. Thompson v. MagnoliaSearch
-
Isaacs v. HobbsSearch
-
easement of right of way -- clearly a part of the property of the debtor of which it claimed ownership. See Thompson v. MagnoliaSearch
-
Petroleum Co., supra. In Warren v. PalmerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
is immaterial. Further support for this position is found in our decision in Group of Institutional Investors v. ChicagoSearch
-
will be maintained on its lines, and that the debtor will not be prejudiced because of the duty thrust upon it. Palmer v. WebsterSearch
-
National Bank, 312 U. S. 156 (1941). Third. It is argued that Continental Illinois National Bank v. ChicagoSearch
-
As we held in Thompson v. TexasSearch
-
Smith v. HobokenSearch
-
the case with Terre Haute bondholders in the Milwaukee Railroad reorganization ( see Group of Institutional Investors v. ChicagoSearch
-
Schwabacher v. UnitedSearch
-
Texas v. UnitedSearch
-
Gardner v. NewSearch
-
Jersey, 329 U. S. 565 . See Thompson v. TerminalSearch
-
Thompson v. MagnoliaSearch
-
Order of Railroad Conductors of America v. PitneySearch
-
U. S. 561 . See Foust v. MunsonSearch
-
S.S. Lines, 299 U. S. 77 . Cf. Railroad Commission of Texas v. PullmanSearch
-
Chicago v. FieldcrestSearch
-
proceedings, and Greenbaum v. LehrenkrausSearch
-
Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. HenwoodSearch
-
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. CallawaySearch
-
Kline v. BurkeSearch
-
b). See Group of Institutional Investors v. ChicagoSearch
-
court is one which heretofore we have zealously guarded against encroachments by state courts. See Thompson v. TexasSearch
-
they are included in the definition of creditors for the purposes of the Act. See Group of Institutional Investors v. ChicagoSearch
-
in state courts. It has long been recognized to have that authority in order to protect its decree. See Local Loan Co. v. HuntSearch
-
of state proceedings by federal courts, has for years recognized bankruptcy jurisdiction as an exception. See Toucey v. NewSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Callaway v. BentonSearch
-
Continental Illinois Bank v. ChicagoSearch
-
Palmer v. MassachusettsSearch
-
See Thompson v. MagnoliaSearch
-
In Warren v. PalmerSearch
-
Palmer v. WebsterSearch
-
Continental Illinois National Bank v. ChicagoSearch
-
Thompson v. TexasSearch
-
Smith v. HobokenSearch
-
See Thompson v. TerminalSearch
-
See Foust v. MunsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial