Citation network
New York Vs. Saper
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 07, 1949
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 328 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court New York v. SaperSearch
-
U.S. 328 (1949) New York v. SaperSearch
-
system which we copied. Sexton v. DreyfusSearch
-
j) approved, at least sub silentio, by this Court in United States v. ChildsSearch
-
Page 336 U. S. 333 also contend that, even after the Chandler Act, the lower courts, and this Court in Meilink v. UnemploymentSearch
-
Petitioners rely most heavily, however, upon this Court's decision in United States v. ChildsSearch
-
of this Court cited by petitioners on this point do not help their cause, and require little discussion. Dayton v. StanardSearch
-
a) required the trustee to seek out and pay in full. New York v. JersawitSearch
-
U. S. 337 there confirms our conclusion that the latter decision was similarly limited to that point. Coder v. ArtsSearch
-
even after the Chandler Act, the lower courts continued to allow post-bankruptcy interest, that this Court, in Meilink v. UnemploymentSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Kallak case obsolete, nevertheless its rule had not been changed, and legislation was necessary, citing Davie v. GreenSearch
-
Affirmed. MR. JUSTICE REED dissents for the reasons given in Davie v. GreenSearch
-
Together with No. 200, New York v. CarterSearch
-
Trustee in Bankruptcy, and No. 201, United States v. CarterSearch
-
Davie v. GreenSearch
-
Bromley v. GoodereSearch
-
proved solvent, creditors received post-bankruptcy interest before any surplus reverted to the debtor, Bromley v. GoodereSearch
-
Ch. 639. These exceptions have been carried over into our system. See American Iron & Steel Mfg. Co. v. SeaboardSearch
-
j), and relies, erroneously, on Dayton v. StanardSearch
-
A. E. Fountain, Inc., 295 F. 873, does not discuss the issue, deciding only that taxes bear simple interest. Horn v. BooneSearch
-
a), contained no provision allowing it, and dictum as to interest in McCormick v. PuritanSearch
-
See note 7 and text and see Thomas v. WesternSearch
-
American Iron & Steel Mfg. Co. v. SeaboardSearch
-
Matter of Union Beverage Co., Inc., 50 A.B.R.(N.S.) 825, 829. And see discussion by the court below in Hammer v. TuffySearch
-
F.2d 447, 449, and in United States v. RothSearch
-
Adams v. NapaSearch
-
United States v. ChildsSearch
-
of payment. It has been held that federal taxes ordinarily bear interest even in the absence of statute. See Billings v. UnitedSearch
-
Guarantee Title & Trust Co. v. TitleSearch
-
of the principle of stare decisis. If it did, the responsible exercise of the judicial process, Helvering v. HallockSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court New York v. SaperSearch
-
Meilink v. UnemploymentSearch
-
Dayton v. StanardSearch
-
New York v. CarterSearch
-
See American Iron & Steel Mfg. Co. v. SeaboardSearch
-
Horn v. BooneSearch
-
McCormick v. PuritanSearch
-
Thomas v. WesternSearch
-
Hammer v. TuffySearch
-
United States v. RothSearch
-
See Billings v. UnitedSearch
-
Helvering v. HallockSearch
-
United States v. CarterSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial