Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Farrell Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 04, 1949

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 1 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Calmar Steamship Corp. Vs. Taylor US Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1938
  2. Farrell v. United
    Search
  3. States - 336 U.S. 511 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court Farrell v. United
    Search
  4. States, 336 U.S. 511 (1949) Farrell v. United
    Search
  5. to which American authorities have paid considerable respect. See Story, Circuit Justice, in Reed v. Canfield
    Search
  6. by the courts below. This is based largely upon statements in the opinion of the Court in Calmar Steamship Corp. v. Taylor
    Search
  7. of maintenance and cure. We think no such distinction exists, or was premised in the Calmar case. In Aguilar v. Standard
    Search
  8. organized seamen, as we have heretofore noted, have steadfastly opposed the change. Hust v. Moore-McCormack
    Search
  9. Skolar v. Lehigh
    Search
  10. Lindgren v. Shephard
    Search
  11. Luksich v. Misetich
    Search
  12. there would be little question that Farrell could recover his wages for the entire twelve-month period. See Enochasson v. Freeport
    Search
  13. Jones v. Waterman
    Search
  14. I agree with Judge Kirkpatrick that the principle of those cases is likewise applicable to foreign voyages. Shields v. United
    Search
  15. binds himself for the period. The obligation to pay wages should be coterminous with that responsibility. Enochasson v. Freeport
    Search
  16. be demanded that is controlling. Page 336 U. S. 522 II. Maintenance and Cure. -- Calmar S.S. Corp. v. Taylor
    Search
  17. presented, for an injury received on returning to a ship from shore leave is plainly incurred in the service. Aguilar v. Standard
    Search
  18. Reed v. Canfield
    Search
  19. Fed.Cas. No. 11,641. Justice Story was of the view that the ship remained liable until the cure was completed. Reed v. Canfield
    Search
  20. even though a maximum cure has been effected. The Josephine & Mary, 120 F.2d 459, 462, 464. Cf. Saunders v. Luckenbach
    Search
  21. the state has had from an early date in a poor and improvident class of workers. See Mr. Justice Story in Harden v. Gordon
    Search
  22. Geistlinger v. International
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Farrell v. United
    Search
  24. In Aguilar v. Standard
    Search
  25. Hust v. Moore-McCormack
    Search
  26. Lindgren v. Shephard
    Search
  27. See Enochasson v. Freeport
    Search
  28. Shields v. United
    Search
  29. Enochasson v. Freeport
    Search
  30. Calmar S.S. Corp. v. Taylor
    Search
  31. Aguilar v. Standard
    Search
  32. Cf. Saunders v. Luckenbach
    Search
  33. Harden v. Gordon
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial