Citation network
Chicago, Etc. Vs. Acme Freight, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 04, 1949
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Chicago, etc. v. AcmeSearch
-
Freight, Inc. - 336 U.S. 465 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court Chicago, etc. v. AcmeSearch
-
Freight, Inc., 336 U.S. 465 (1949) Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R. Co. v. AcmeSearch
-
Commission. The legislative and judicial history culminating in the Act need not now be detailed. See United States v. ChicagoSearch
-
Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
nor enter into joint or proportional rates with them absent legislative authority. Interstate Commerce Commission v. DelawareSearch
-
Great Northern R. Co. v. O'ConnorSearch
-
Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
to sanction the joint rates that forwarders had established with certain motor carriers. See Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Texas Page 336 U. S. 480 R. Co. of Texas v. WardSearch
-
Cincinnati, N.O. & T.P. R. Co. v. RankinSearch
-
that it had contracted with the carrier at the reduced rate. This result is clearly contrary to Great Northern R. Co. v. O'ConnorSearch
-
See Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. RiversideSearch
-
is not concerned with questions of ownership, but must treat the forwarder as shipper. Interstate Commerce Commission v. DelawareSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
century. They have continued to do so since enactment of the Freight Forwarder Act. See, e.g., Merchant Shippers Assn. v. KelloggSearch
-
For a full description of freight forwarder practices, see United States v. ChicagoSearch
-
Krender v. WoolcottSearch
-
Heath v. JudsonSearch
-
Mansfield v. ChicagoSearch
-
Hilt. (N.Y.) 223 (1856). See also Christenson v. AmericanSearch
-
Barge v. AmericanSearch
-
Kettenhofen v. GlobeSearch
-
Highway Freight Forwarding Co. v. PublicSearch
-
J. Nelson Kagarise Application, 260 I.C.C. 745. Cf. United States v. AmericanSearch
-
permitted to sue underlying carriers for loss or damage occasioned by the latter. New Jersey Steam Navigation Co. v. Merchants'Search
-
The forwarder, as agent of an undisclosed principal, could, of course, sue on the contract. Merchant Shippers Assn. v. KelloggSearch
-
the latter's lines, but, since it acted for a disclosed principal, it was not a party to the contract. See Bichlmeir v. MinneapolisSearch
-
became a principal and all its connecting carriers agents for the transportation of the goods. Northern Pacific R. Co. v. WallSearch
-
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. RiversideSearch
-
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R. Co. v. AcmeSearch
-
See United States v. ChicagoSearch
-
Interstate Commerce Commission v. DelawareSearch
-
See Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
R. Co. of Texas v. WardSearch
-
Merchant Shippers Assn. v. KelloggSearch
-
Christenson v. AmericanSearch
-
Cf. United States v. AmericanSearch
-
New Jersey Steam Navigation Co. v. Merchants'Search
-
See Bichlmeir v. MinneapolisSearch
-
Northern Pacific R. Co. v. WallSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial