Citation network
United States Vs. Jones
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 18, 1949
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 641 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. JonesSearch
-
U.S. 641 (1949) United States v. JonesSearch
-
b) No such jurisdiction was intended to be suggested by the language of this Court's opinion in United States v. GriffinSearch
-
back and forth through the Commission and the courts, finally to come here now for the second time. See United States v. GriffinSearch
-
as increased compensation due for the years 1931 to 1938, Griffin v. UnitedSearch
-
in a decree filed on February 23, 1937. The Government appealed directly to this Court, which, in United States v. GriffinSearch
-
and upon statements made in part Fourth of the opinion in United States v. GriffinSearch
-
to authorizations of the Postmaster General for such service, it had been thought, until the decision in United States v. GriffinSearch
-
basis for the Court's ruling is no longer effective, Rochester Telephone Corporation v. UnitedSearch
-
of an action for the balance, as the claim asserted is one founded upon a law of Congress. Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 271 U. S. 603 . Compare United States v. NewSearch
-
Stat. 505, have jurisdiction also of an action for additional compensation if an order is confiscatory. United States v. GreatSearch
-
North American Transportation & Trading Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Jacobs v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
if the Commission is alleged to have acted in excess of its authority, or otherwise illegally. Compare Powell v. UnitedSearch
-
of fact going to the order's appropriateness on the merits. The case is wholly unlike Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. NewSearch
-
Together with No. 198, Jones, Receiver v. UnitedSearch
-
The opinion, quoting the Court of Claims' language in an earlier railway mail pay case, New York Central R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 65 Ct.Cl. 115, 128-129, aff'd, United States v. NewSearch
-
Cf. Jacobs v. UnitedSearch
-
of Columbia courts created pursuant to that Article to exercise legislative functions such as ratemaking. Cf. Keller v. PotomacSearch
-
Postum Cereal Co. v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. AbileneSearch
-
Rochester Telephone Corporation v. UnitedSearch
-
Myers v. BethlehemSearch
-
United States v. IllinoisSearch
-
Shields v. UtahSearch
-
Idaho Cent. R. Co., 305 U. S. 177 , 305 U. S. 184 -185. Cf. Norton v. WarnerSearch
-
Cited in the text, 303 U.S. at 303 U. S. 238 , were Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
pouch space) but for space in which postal employees sorted mail ( e.g., apartment mail cars), and United States v. NewSearch
-
Chicago & E.I. R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Nevada County Narrow Gauge R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Macon, D. & S. R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
The Nevada County Narrow Gauge R. Co. case, supra, was a companion to New York Central R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 65 Ct.Cl. 115, aff'd, United States v. NewSearch
-
In Pere Marquette R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Ct.Cl. at 248. Cf. Denver & Rio Grande R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
noted that district court suits to enjoin the Postmaster General's fraud orders are commonplace. See, e.g., Williams v. FanningSearch
-
See Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 280 U. S. 420 , 280 U. S. 444 , n. 4. Cf. National Broadcasting Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Shields v. UtahSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. JonesSearch
-
See United States v. GriffinSearch
-
Griffin v. UnitedSearch
-
Rochester Telephone Corporation v. UnitedSearch
-
of Congress. Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare United States v. NewSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial