Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Fpc Vs. Interstate Nat. Gas Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 18, 1949

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

45 entries 45 unlinked
Show
  1. FPC v. Interstate
    Search
  2. Nat. Gas Co. - 336 U.S. 577 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. Interstate
    Search
  3. Nat. Gas Co., 336 U.S. 577 (1949) Federal Power Commission v. Interstate
    Search
  4. Power Commission, their claims to the fund are determinable solely with reference to federal law. Central States Co. v. Muscatine
    Search
  5. gas or to such others as may be equitably entitled to it. The Court of Appeals, relying on Central States Electric Co. v. Muscatine
    Search
  6. companies accountable for the amounts involved. 166 F.2d 796. First. Here, unlike Central States Electric Co. v. Muscatine
    Search
  7. engaged in the transportation or sale at wholesale of natural gas in interstate commerce. See Illinois Natural Gas Co. v. Central
    Search
  8. is designed to regulate the segment of the industry occupied by such distributors. See Interstate Natural Gas Co. v. Federal
    Search
  9. Federal Power Commission v. Hope
    Search
  10. aim of the Act was to protect ultimate consumers of natural gas from excessive charges. See Federal Power Commission v. Hope
    Search
  11. United States v. Morgan
    Search
  12. of injunction, it has a responsibility to protect all the interests whom its injunction may affect. Inland Steel Co. v. Page
    Search
  13. U. S. 153 . It assumes the duty to make disposition of the fund in accord with equitable principles. United States v. Morgan
    Search
  14. to the problem of determining what claimants are equitably entitled to share in it. See Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Florida
    Search
  15. court might hold the fund until those having the final say on the state law questions have spoken. Cf. Thompson v. Magnolia
    Search
  16. Spector Motor Service v. Page
    Search
  17. Together with No. 188, Public Service Commission of Missouri v. Interstate
    Search
  18. No. 209, Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Interstate
    Search
  19. Natural Gas Co. et al., and No. 212, Illinois Commerce Commission et al. v. Interstate
    Search
  20. The respondents -- Interstate and the three immediate purchasers from it -- basically rely on Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer
    Search
  21. have been wrongfully exacted. They deem that case to be the foundation of our decision in Central States Electric Co. v. City
    Search
  22. by a regulatory commission may not be a reasonable rate. See Brandeis, J., in Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public
    Search
  23. In my dissent in Federal Power Commission v. Hope
    Search
  24. court's stay blocked the congressional mechanism intended to produce lower consumer rates. Central States Electric Co. v. Muscatine
    Search
  25. purpose or with equitable principles by which the court must be governed in administering the fund. Inland Steel Co. v. United
    Search
  26. of state rights by the federal courts. This seems an appropriate time to reverse Central States Electric Co. v. Muscatine
    Search
  27. Interstate Natural Gas Co. v. Federal
    Search
  28. See McCart v. Indianapolis
    Search
  29. interesting to note the unchallenged assertion in the Government brief that, although, in Central States Electric Co. v. Muscatine
    Search
  30. U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. Interstate
    Search
  31. Federal Power Commission v. Interstate
    Search
  32. Central States Co. v. Muscatine
    Search
  33. Central States Electric Co. v. Muscatine
    Search
  34. See Illinois Natural Gas Co. v. Central
    Search
  35. See Interstate Natural Gas Co. v. Federal
    Search
  36. See Federal Power Commission v. Hope
    Search
  37. Inland Steel Co. v. Page
    Search
  38. See Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Florida
    Search
  39. Cf. Thompson v. Magnolia
    Search
  40. Public Service Commission of Missouri v. Interstate
    Search
  41. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Interstate
    Search
  42. Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer
    Search
  43. Central States Electric Co. v. City
    Search
  44. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public
    Search
  45. Inland Steel Co. v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial