Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Ex Parte Collett

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 31, 1949

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

40 entries 6 linked 34 unlinked
Show
  1. Crane Vs. Hahlo US Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1922
  2. Bate Refrigerating Co. Vs. Sulzberger US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 1895
  3. United States Vs. Bowen US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1879
  4. National Exchange Bank of Baltimore Vs. Peters US Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1892
  5. Mcburney Vs. Carson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  6. Gulf Oil Corp. Vs. Gilbert US Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1947
  7. Code, forum non conveniens was not available in Federal Employers' Liability Act suits. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Kepner
    Search
  8. Miles v. Illinois
    Search
  9. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert
    Search
  10. forum even though the venue is proper. As an example of the need of such a provision, see Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Kepner
    Search
  11. Gemsco v. Walling
    Search
  12. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS in United States v. National
    Search
  13. a) to FELA suits have been reported. Four have held that the section is applicable. Hayes v. Chicago
    Search
  14. White v. Thompson
    Search
  15. Nunn v. Chicago
    Search
  16. Scott v. New
    Search
  17. Brainard v. Atchison
    Search
  18. Perry v. Atchison
    Search
  19. Chaffin v. Chesapeake
    Search
  20. Richer v. Chicago
    Search
  21. F.Supp. 971 (1948). One reported decision has held that the Code section is inapplicable to such suits. Pascarella v. New
    Search
  22. For a brief historical sketch, see Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Kepner
    Search
  23. in different statutory sections. Brief for New York, C. & St.L.R. Co. as Amicus Curiae, pp. 11-2, Kilpatrick v. Texas
    Search
  24. E.g., Packard Motor Car Co. v. Labor
    Search
  25. United States v. American
    Search
  26. S. 543 (1940), and cases there cited. The rule as to statutory revisions is the same. Continental Casualty Co. v. United
    Search
  27. Gwin v. United
    Search
  28. Roche v. Evaporated
    Search
  29. Milk Assn., 319 U. S. 21 (1943), and cases there cited. Cf. United States Alkali Export Assn. v. United
    Search
  30. of the Clayton Act, involved in our decision in United States v. National
    Search
  31. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Kepner
    Search
  32. United States v. National
    Search
  33. Hayes v. Chicago
    Search
  34. Brainard v. Atchison
    Search
  35. Pascarella v. New
    Search
  36. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Kepner
    Search
  37. Kilpatrick v. Texas
    Search
  38. Continental Casualty Co. v. United
    Search
  39. Cf. United States Alkali Export Assn. v. United
    Search
  40. Sherman v. Grinnell
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales