Citation network
interstate Oil Pipe Line Co. Vs. Stone
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 20, 1949
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 662 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court Interstate Oil Pipe Line Co. v. StoneSearch
-
U.S. 662 (1949) Interstate Oil Pipe Line Co. v. StoneSearch
-
situated in Mississippi, Memphis Gas Co. v. StoneSearch
-
U. S. 80 , 335 U. S. 92 -93, or upon the gross receipts themselves, Central Greyhound Lines v. MealeySearch
-
by the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution merely because, unlike the statute attacked in Memphis Gas Co. v. StoneSearch
-
Any notions to the contrary should not have survived Maine v. GrandSearch
-
Trunk decision has been approved by this Court as recently as the other controlling case of Central Greyhound Lines v. MealeySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
a different tax for the protection upon which one or more of these taxes is based. E.g., Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. StoneSearch
-
Pearson v. ProbateSearch
-
International Harvester Co. v. DeptSearch
-
Nelson v. SearsSearch
-
See concurring opinion in Freeman v. HewitSearch
-
the Grand Trunk opinion suggests the explanation hazarded by Mr. Justice Holmes in Galveston, H. & S.A. R. Co. v. TexasSearch
-
See the cases discussed in Western Live Stock v. BureauSearch
-
concurring opinion in Freeman v. HewitSearch
-
Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Anglo-Chilean Nitrate Sales Corp. v. AlabamaSearch
-
separate opinion in International Harvester Co. v. DeptSearch
-
concurring opinion in Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. StoneSearch
-
Best & Co. v. MaxwellSearch
-
Hale v. BimcoSearch
-
Cf. Gwin, White & Prince v. HennefordSearch
-
Adams Mfg. Co. v. StorenSearch
-
Western Live Stock v. BureauSearch
-
Interstate Oil Pipeline Co. v. StoneSearch
-
Miss. 715, 35 So.2d 73, 75. See an opinion of three members of this Court in Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. StoneSearch
-
See Stone v. MemphisSearch
-
pumping machinery or other equipment as incidents apart from the flow of the interstate commerce. Cf. Coverdale v. PipeSearch
-
It considered taxability of the transportation in the light of Coe v. ErrolSearch
-
U. S. 517 , and Champlain Realty Co. v. BrattleboroSearch
-
of the precise line that marks the change from intrastate movement to interstate movement has been difficult. In Coe v. ErrolSearch
-
deliberate Page 337 U. S. 673 detention to await a suitable time for shipment across a state line. Kelley v. RhoadsSearch
-
the interstate transportation by floatage began when the logs were put into the water. Champlain Realty Co. v. TownSearch
-
means of transportation as to whether the transportation was interstate. United States v. CapitalSearch
-
a single state immediately preceding or following recognized interstate transportation. They were referred to in Coe v. ErrolSearch
-
commodity is restored to the mass of property within a state by the termination of the transportation. See Joy Oil Co. v. StateSearch
-
such as are discussed in the opinions in the undecisive case of Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. StoneSearch
-
Ozark Pipe Line Corp. v. PageSearch
-
U. S. 218 , in the light of Southern Natural Gas Corp. v. AlabamaSearch
-
A recent pronouncement of this Court has recognized this limitation on state power. In Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Comm'rsSearch
-
P. 332 U. S. 504 . See Memphis Natural Gas Co. Page 337 U. S. 679 v. StoneSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Interstate Oil Pipe Line Co. v. StoneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial