Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Woods Vs. Interstate Realty Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 20, 1949

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 5 linked 34 unlinked
Show
  1. GriffIn Vs. Mccoach US Supreme Court · Jun 02, 1941
  2. Angel Vs. Bullington US Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1947
  3. Erie Railroad Co. Vs. Tompkins US Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1938
  4. Cities Service Oil Co. Vs. Dunlap US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1939
  5. Palmer Vs. Hoffman US Supreme Court · Feb 01, 1943
  6. Woods v. Interstate
    Search
  7. Realty Co. - 337 U.S. 535 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court Woods v. Interstate
    Search
  8. Realty Co., 337 U.S. 535 (1949) Woods v. Interstate
    Search
  9. the motion for summary judgment was properly granted. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  10. was not void, but only unenforceable, in the Mississippi courts. It held, in reliance on David Lupton's Sons Co. v. Automobile
    Search
  11. writ of certiorari which we granted because of the seeming conflict of that holding with our recent ruling in Angel v. Bullington
    Search
  12. We said in Angel v. Bullington
    Search
  13. based on a view of diversity jurisdiction which came to an end with Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  14. Bullington v. Angel
    Search
  15. that suit could not be maintained because (1) the prior suit was res judicata, and (2) the policy of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  16. a decision rests on two or more grounds, none can be relegated to the category of obiter dictum. United States v. Title
    Search
  17. Massachusetts v. United
    Search
  18. States, 333 U. S. 611 , 333 U. S. 623 . Page 337 U. S. 538 Angel v. Bullington
    Search
  19. in its alternative ground, followed the view of Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
    Search
  20. and thus to follow local law, as had previously been done in cases involving burden of proof, Cities Service Oil Co. v. Dunlap
    Search
  21. Stoner v. New
    Search
  22. contributory negligence, Palmer v. Hoffman
    Search
  23. conflict of laws, Klaxon Co. v. Stentor
    Search
  24. U. S. 498 , and accrual of the cause of action, West v. American
    Search
  25. to invoke the diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts. It was that element of discrimination that Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  26. Reversed. MR. JUSTICE RUTLEDGE dissents. See his dissenting opinion in Nos. 442 and 512, Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  27. MR. JUSTICE JACKSON, dissenting. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  28. refusing to accept the state court's determination of the effect of its own statute is a perversion of the Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Woods v. Interstate
    Search
  30. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  31. David Lupton's Sons Co. v. Automobile
    Search
  32. of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  33. United States v. Title
    Search
  34. of Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
    Search
  35. Stoner v. New
    Search
  36. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor
    Search
  37. West v. American
    Search
  38. Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  39. of the Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial