Citation network
Brinegar Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1949
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 338 U.S. 160 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 338 U.S. 160 (1949) Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
to show probable cause for the search, and the evidence seized was admissible against petitioner at the trial. Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
probable cause for Brinegar's arrest, in the light of prior adjudications on this problem, more particularly Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
before the search, though admitted on the hearing on the motion to suppress, was excluded at the trial. Cf. Michelson v. UnitedSearch
-
by the jury. Thus, in this case, the trial court properly excluded from the record at the trial, cf. Michelson v. UnitedSearch
-
or conviction, as Marshall, C.J., said for the Court more than a century ago in Locke v. UnitedSearch
-
an offense has been or is being committed. Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
We find it is unnecessary to take account of this factor in deciding this case. As to the factor of flight, see Husty v. UnitedSearch
-
Talley v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. HeitnerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
Levine v. UnitedSearch
-
Grau v. UnitedSearch
-
search warrant may issue only upon evidence which would be competent in the trial of the offense before a jury ( Giles v. UnitedSearch
-
Wagner v. UnitedSearch
-
Simmons v. UnitedSearch
-
Worthington v. UnitedSearch
-
Reeve v. HoweSearch
-
United States v. NoveroSearch
-
F.Supp. 275, 279. Cf. Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
Marshall's full statement in Locke v. UnitedSearch
-
Husty v. UnitedSearch
-
Dumbra v. UnitedSearch
-
Steele v. UnitedSearch
-
P. 267 U. S. 161 . Ascription of the statement to Locke v. UnitedSearch
-
in the opinion of the Court that there was probable cause for the search within the standards established in Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Saia v. NewSearch
-
a few bottles of bourbon and catch a bootlegger. The Court sustains this search as an application of Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
trial of defendant unless he was unwise enough to open the subject himself by offering character testimony. See Greer v. UnitedSearch
-
the search, at its commencement, must be valid, and cannot be saved by what it turns up. Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
McDonald v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 335 U. S. 451 , and see Nueslein v. DistrictSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Michelson v. UnitedSearch
-
Michelson v. UnitedSearch
-
Locke v. UnitedSearch
-
Grau v. UnitedSearch
-
Giles v. UnitedSearch
-
Reeve v. HoweSearch
-
Cf. Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
of Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
See Greer v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Nueslein v. DistrictSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial