Citation network
Watts Vs. Indiana
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1949
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 49 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
U.S. 49 (1949) Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
provisions, and their proper applications, are issues for this Court's adjudication. Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSearch
-
though cast in the form of determinations of fact, are the very issues to review which this Court sits. See Norris v. AlabamaSearch
-
sustain them. Reversed MR. JUSTICE BLACK concurs in the judgment of the Court on the authority of Chambers v. FloridaSearch
-
does not have the corrective power over State courts that it has over the lower federal courts. See, e.g., McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
under the Due Process Clause even though statements in it may be independently established as true. See Lisenba v. CaliforniaSearch
-
A) Confession was found to be procured under circumstances violative of the Due Process Clause in Haley v. OhioSearch
-
Malinski v. NewSearch
-
Lomax v. TexasSearch
-
Vernon v. AlabamaSearch
-
White v. TexasSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Canty v. AlabamaSearch
-
Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
Ashcraft v. TennesseeSearch
-
B) Confession was found to have been procured under circumstances not violative of the Due Process Clause in Lyons v. OklahomaSearch
-
U. S. 596 , and Lisenba v. CaliforniaSearch
-
of the magistrate. We should unequivocally condemn the procedure, and stand ready to outlaw, as we did in Malinski v. NewSearch
-
York, 324 U. S. 401 , and Haley v. OhioSearch
-
For other opinions in No. 76, Harris v. SouthSearch
-
Carolina, and No. 107, Turner v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Watts v. IndianaSearch
-
Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSearch
-
See Norris v. AlabamaSearch
-
of Chambers v. FloridaSearch
-
McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
See Lisenba v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Haley v. OhioSearch
-
Lyons v. OklahomaSearch
-
and Lisenba v. CaliforniaSearch
-
and Haley v. OhioSearch
-
Harris v. SouthSearch
-
Turner v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Ashcraft v. TennesseeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial