Citation network
Wolf Vs. Colorado
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1949
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 25 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
U.S. 25 (1949) Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pp. 338 U. S. 27 -28. (b) While the doctrine of Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
in a court of the United States because there deemed to be an infraction of the Fourth Amendment as applied in Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
incorporates them, has been rejected by this Court again and again, after impressive consideration. See, e.g., Hurtado v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Twining v. NewSearch
-
Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
after thorough reexamination of the scope and function of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Adamson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Clause imposed upon the States in the enforcement of their criminal law, we adhere to the views expressed in Palko v. ConnecticutSearch
-
Davidson v. NewSearch
-
to this insight, the Court has, on the whole, been faithful as case after case has come before it since Davidson v. NewSearch
-
which spring from an allowable range of judgment on issues not susceptible of quantitative solution. In Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
against such an insistence on our own view is furnished by the opinion of Mr. Justice (then Judge) Cardozo in People v. DeforeSearch
-
The common law provides actions for damages against the searching officer, e.g., Entick v. CarringtonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Grumon v. RaymondSearch
-
Sandford v. NicholsSearch
-
Halsted v. BriceSearch
-
Hussey v. DavisSearch
-
Reed v. LucasSearch
-
against one who procures the issuance of a warrant maliciously and without probable cause, e.g., Gulsby v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Whitson v. MaySearch
-
Kretabiel v. HenkleSearch
-
Olson v. TveteSearch
-
Boeger v. LangenbergSearch
-
Doane v. AndersonSearch
-
Shall v. MinneapolisSearch
-
against a magistrate who has acted without jurisdiction in issuing a warrant, e.g., Williams v. KozakSearch
-
Kennedy v. TerrillSearch
-
Shaw v. MoonSearch
-
Ore. 558, 245 P. 318, and against persons assisting in the execution of an illegal search, e.g., Hebrew v. PulisSearch
-
Cartwright v. CanodeSearch
-
Texas 502, 171 S.W. 696. One may also without liability use force to resist an unlawful search. E.g., Commonwealth v. MartinSearch
-
State v. MannSearch
-
Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
States Which Opposed the Weeks Doctrine Before the Weeks Case Had Been Decided Ala. Shields V. StateSearch
-
Ala. 35, 16 So. 85. ARK. Starchman v. StateSearch
-
Ark. 538, 36 S.W. 940. CONN. State v. GriswoldSearch
-
Conn. 290, 34 A. 1046. GA. Williams v. StateSearch
-
Ga. 511, 28 S.E. 624. IDAHO State v. BondSearch
-
Idaho 424, 439, 86 P. 43, 47. ILL. Siebert v. PeopleSearch
-
Ill. 571, 583, 32 N.E. 431, 434. KAN. State v. MillerSearch
-
Kan. 62, 64 P. 1033. ME. See State v . Gorham, 65 Me. 270, 272. MD. Lawrence v. StateSearch
-
A. 96, 103. Page 338 U. S. 34 MASS. Commonwealth v. DanaSearch
-
Metc. 329. MICH. People v. AldorferSearch
-
Mich. 676, 130 N. w. 351. MINN. State v. StraitSearch
-
Minn. 384, 102 N. w. 913. MO. State v. PomeroySearch
-
Mo. 489, 32 S.W. 1002. MONT. See State v. FullerSearch
-
Mont. 12, 19, 85 P. 369, 373. NEB. Geiger v. StateSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial