Citation network
O'Donnell Vs. Elgin, J. and E. Ry. Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 12, 1949
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
O'Donnell v. ElginSearch
-
J. & E. Ry. Co. - 338 U.S. 384 (1949) U.S. Supreme Court O'Donnell v. ElginSearch
-
J. & E. Ry. Co., 338 U.S. 384 (1949) O'Donnell v. ElginSearch
-
need not resolve the conflict between these competing theories of causation, for that decision was for the jury. Ellis v. UnionSearch
-
ends of the cars. This construction finds some support in the decisions. See, e.g., St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. ConartySearch
-
Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. LaytonSearch
-
Johnson v. SouthernSearch
-
Pacific Co., 196 U. S. 1 , 196 U. S. 18 . See also United States v. SouthernSearch
-
Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. CharltonSearch
-
Chicago, M., Page 338 U. S. 388 St. P. & P. R. Co. v. LinehanSearch
-
Penn v. ChicagoSearch
-
Keenan v. DirectorSearch
-
Philadelphia & R. R. Co. v. EisenhartSearch
-
Erie R. Co. v. CaldwellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Southern Pacific Co. v. ThomasSearch
-
Kowalski v. ChicagoSearch
-
Saxton v. DelawareSearch
-
Stewart v. WabashSearch
-
Reetz v. ChicagoSearch
-
to have been the view of this Court in the only case of this nature ever before it. Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. GotschallSearch
-
U. S. 66 . See also Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie R. Co. v. GoneauSearch
-
jurisdictions will be regarded as some evidence of negligence, to be weighed by the jury along with the facts. Hayes v. MichiganSearch
-
Union Pacific R. Co. v. McDonaldSearch
-
evidence of negligence which defendant must meet or overcome. E.g., Voiles v. HuntSearch
-
Iowa 1234, 240 N.W. 703. Courts sometimes talk of it in terms of res ipsa loquitur, cf. Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. GotschallSearch
-
supra, or treat violations as negligence per se. E.g., San Antonio & A.R. R. Co. v. WagnerSearch
-
Watts v. MontgomerySearch
-
Evans v. KlusmeyerSearch
-
It is not uncommon that, within the same jurisdiction, the rule is different as to different statutes. See Martin v. HerzogSearch
-
a liability that cannot be escaped by proof of care or diligence. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern R. Co. v. TaylorSearch
-
Brady v. TerminalSearch
-
San Antonio & A.P. R. Co. v. WagnerSearch
-
Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. GotschallSearch
-
Vigor v. ChesapeakeSearch
-
Philadelphia & R. Co. v. EisenhartSearch
-
Hudson Co., 256 N.Y. 363, 176 N.E. 425 (1931). Cf. Vigor v. ChesapeakeSearch
-
Western & Atlantic R. v. GentleSearch
-
E.g., San Antonio & A.P. R. Co. v. WagnerSearch
-
Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. GentleSearch
-
Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. HortonSearch
-
See Myers v. ReadingSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court O'Donnell v. ElginSearch
-
Ellis v. UnionSearch
-
St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. ConartySearch
-
United States v. SouthernSearch
-
St. P. & P. R. Co. v. LinehanSearch
-
Reetz v. ChicagoSearch
-
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie R. Co. v. GoneauSearch
-
Hayes v. MichiganSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial