Citation network
Maggio Vs. Zeitz
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 09, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 56 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court Maggio v. ZeitzSearch
-
U.S. 56 (1948) Maggio v. ZeitzSearch
-
property has been abstracted from the bankrupt estate and is in the possession of the party proceeded against. Oriel v. RussellSearch
-
by the Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, without opinion other than citation of its own prior cases. Zeitz v. MaggioSearch
-
Danish v. SofranskiSearch
-
Seligson v. GoldsmithSearch
-
Rosenblum v. MarinelloSearch
-
Robbins v. GotthetterSearch
-
Cohen v. JeskowitzSearch
-
Zeitz v. MaggioSearch
-
the turnover order has been sustained as an appropriate and necessary step in enforcing the Bankruptcy Act. Oriel v. RussellSearch
-
U. S. 106 . See also Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. WilkinsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
involved in an accident, for no apparent purpose except to get it beyond the reach of a tort creditor, see Rosenblum v. MarinelloSearch
-
Penfield Co. v. SecuritiesSearch
-
U. S. 585 . We thus have before us now a civil contempt of the same kind that was before the Court in Oriel v. RussellSearch
-
res judicata, and not subject to collateral attack in the contempt proceedings. This we long ago settled in Oriel v. RussellSearch
-
be justified by retrying the issues as to whether the order should have issued in the first place. United States v. UnitedSearch
-
of the property by him subsequent to the turnover proceedings. We do not believe these views are required by Oriel v. RussellSearch
-
the principles laid down in this Court's opinion. Manufacturers' Page 333 U. S. 78 Finance Company v. McKeySearch
-
C.C.A.8th in Marin v. EllisSearch
-
C.C.A.4th in Brune v. FraidinSearch
-
U. S. 278 U.S. 358, 278 U. S. 366 , quoting from In re Epstein (cited as Epstein v. SteinfeldSearch
-
and cited Toplitz v. WalserSearch
-
Epstein v. SteinfeldSearch
-
Schmid v. RosenthalSearch
-
F. 818, a turnover case, citing Epstein v. SteinfeldSearch
-
Frederick v. SilvermanSearch
-
Reardon v. PensoneauSearch
-
Paleais v. MooreSearch
-
Drakeford v. AdamsSearch
-
commitment order should not issue. Other decisions are to the same effect. See, for example, American Trust Co. v. WallisSearch
-
Samel et al. v. DoddSearch
-
Dittmar v. MichelsonSearch
-
Freed v. CentralSearch
-
Johnson et al. v. GoldsteinSearch
-
Clark v. MilensSearch
-
Berkhower v. MielznerSearch
-
Smiley v. SmileySearch
-
Barton v. BartonSearch
-
Hurd v. HurdSearch
-
Heflebower v. HeflebowerSearch
-
Ohio St. 674, 133 N.E. 455, and Fowler v. FowlerSearch
-
See note 6 supra. Of course, cases such as Gompers v. UnitedSearch
-
Michaelson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 266 U. S. 42 , Pendergast v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 317 U. S. 412 , and Cooke v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Maggio v. ZeitzSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial