Citation network
Johnson Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 09, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 333 U.S. 46 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 333 U.S. 46 (1948) Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
for a writ of certiorari which we granted because of the seeming misapplication by the court below of Jesionowski v. BostonSearch
-
hit, he was bending over coiling the line on the deck. The rule of res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. BostonSearch
-
force might conceivably compel him to do so. But where, as here, the injured person is not implicated ( Jesionowski v. BostonSearch
-
liable for injuries to a seaman resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of another employee. See De Zon v. AmericanSearch
-
reason in logic or experience why res ipsa loquitur is not applicable to acts of a fellow servant. See Lejeune v. GeneralSearch
-
Johnson v. MetropolitanSearch
-
injuries arising from instruments or properties under the employer's exclusive control. San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. RequenaSearch
-
Jesionowski v. BostonSearch
-
Lukon v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Sweeting v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
here, the Federal Employers' Liability Act compels us to go no higher than a fellow servant. See Terminal R. Assn. v. StaengelSearch
-
between petitioner and the government doctors for outpatient treatment and rest at his home might be inferred. Cf. Rey v. ColonialSearch
-
Moyle v. NationalSearch
-
that petitioner had incurred no expense or liability for his care and support at the home of his parents. See Field v. WatermanSearch
-
I agree that, if the rule of res ipsa loquitur determines this case, the scope of that rule is found in Sweeney v. ErvingSearch
-
withhold his testimony. Federal judges are not referees at prize fights, but functionaries of justice. See Herron v. SouthernSearch
-
Quercia v. UnitedSearch
-
are determined within the scope of the pleadings, not left to counsel's chosen argument. See New York Cent. R. Co. v. JohnsonSearch
-
Whipple v. CumberlandSearch
-
Cotton Co., 3 Story 84, 86, he has the power to call and examine witnesses to elicit the truth. See Glasser v. UnitedSearch
-
Chalmette Petroleum Corporation v. ChalmetteSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
of Jesionowski v. BostonSearch
-
See De Zon v. AmericanSearch
-
See Lejeune v. GeneralSearch
-
San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. RequenaSearch
-
See Terminal R. Assn. v. StaengelSearch
-
Cf. Rey v. ColonialSearch
-
See Field v. WatermanSearch
-
See Herron v. SouthernSearch
-
See New York Cent. R. Co. v. JohnsonSearch
-
See Glasser v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial