Citation network
Eccles Vs. Peoples Bank
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 15, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Eccles v. PeoplesSearch
-
Bank - 333 U.S. 426 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court Eccles v. PeoplesSearch
-
Bank, 333 U.S. 426 (1948) Eccles v. PeoplesSearch
-
Compare Fahey v. MalloneeSearch
-
relief, should be granted only as a matter of judicial discretion, exercised in the public interest. Brillhart v. ExcessSearch
-
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSearch
-
Equity Rule 46 forbade such practice save in exceptional cases. See Los Angeles Brush Mfg. Corporation v. JamesSearch
-
of affidavits, rather than after oral proof presented in open court. See Amidon, J., in Great Northern R. Co. v. BrosseauSearch
-
Swan, J., in Aeolian Co. v. FischerSearch
-
F.2d 679, 681, 682. Where administrative intention is expressed, but has not yet come to fruition ( Ashwander v. TennesseeSearch
-
U. S. 288 , 297 U. S. 324 ), or where that intention is unknown ( Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GrosjeanSearch
-
to Transamerica, and, by noting this agreement on their certificates, could bind their transferees. Cf. Vannucci v. PedriniSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
a petition for a declaratory judgment and an injunction to stop a threatened or existing injury. Federation of Labor v. McAdorySearch
-
U. S. 450 , 325 U. S. 461 . That discretion is not unfettered. Altvater v. FreemanSearch
-
relations of adverse parties, discretion usually cannot properly be exercised by refusing an adjudication. Meredith v. WinterSearch
-
Bell v. HoodSearch
-
U. S. 678 . Unusual circumstances, not here present, such as other pending suits, Brillhart v. ExcessSearch
-
Insurance Co., 316 U. S. 491 , or supersession of state authority, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSearch
-
its business, respondent is entitled to protection Page 333 U. S. 437 now. See Columbia Broadcasting System v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Eccles v. PeoplesSearch
-
Brillhart v. ExcessSearch
-
See Los Angeles Brush Mfg. Corporation v. JamesSearch
-
Great Northern R. Co. v. BrosseauSearch
-
Aeolian Co. v. FischerSearch
-
Ashwander v. TennesseeSearch
-
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GrosjeanSearch
-
Cf. Vannucci v. PedriniSearch
-
Meredith v. WinterSearch
-
See Columbia Broadcasting System v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial