Citation network
Massachusetts Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 19, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Massachusetts v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 333 U.S. 611 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court Massachusetts v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 333 U.S. 611 (1948) Massachusetts v. UnitedSearch
-
for unemployment compensation taxes imposed by a state statute conforming to the federal act's requirements, Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
Illinois v. CampbellSearch
-
of the amount of such taxes. Pp. 333 U. S. 628 -629. 3. Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 328 U. S. 8 , and Illinois v. CampbellSearch
-
the Court. This case is, for all practical purposes, a renewal of the litigation recently here in Illinois ex rel. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 328 U. S. 8 , and the companion case of Illinois v. CampbellSearch
-
The facts are substantially identical with those in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
more than sufficient to pay either the Title 8 or the Title 9 taxes, though inadequate to pay both, while, in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
fact that, here, the debtor's assignee has paid to the commonwealth the full amount of its claim, while in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
federal Title 9 claim or in some form of allocation between it and Massachusetts' claim. This was not true of Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
States, or indeed of Illinois v. CampbellSearch
-
Hence, it is said we did not acquire jurisdiction over the Title 9 claims. The argument is correct concerning Illinois v. CampbellSearch
-
But it is surprising as applied to Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
completely misconceives its action, and serves only to confuse the judgment in that case with the one in Illinois v. CampbellSearch
-
both cases, but in opposite ways on entirely different facts and legal issues. Page 333 U. S. 620 In Illinois v. CampbellSearch
-
b) did not apply in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
so as to differentiate Page 333 U. S. 622 the two cases and to avoid any direction that the fund in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
as much upon the one determination as the other. In such a case, the adjudication is effective for both. United States v. TitleSearch
-
Union Pac. R. Co. v. MasonSearch
-
Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 275 U. S. 331 , 275 U. S. 340 . III Finally, it is urged that, in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 333 U. S. 624 Closely related to this, though not involved on the facts in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
the concessions involve. Moreover, the fact that, in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
We shall not repeat the answers made in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
and, as we repeated in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
States, quoting United States v. EmorySearch
-
U. S. 328 U.S. 8, 328 U. S. 12 . See also United States v. RemundSearch
-
The District Court thought that, in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SpencerSearch
-
attaches from the time the insolvent debtor transfers or loses control over his property. Illinois v. CampbellSearch
-
United States v. WaddillSearch
-
United States v. OklahomaSearch
-
The opinion in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
to stimulate the creation of sound state systems. 328 U. S. 328 U.S. 8, 328 U. S. 10 . See Illinois v. CampbellSearch
-
for those years were made after December 6, 1940. This section formed the basis for a claim to credit in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
a) of the 1943 Act, see note 13 allowed conditional credit for the tax years involved in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
Ibid. The order for judgment in Illinois v. UnitedSearch
-
The federal priority has been uniformly sustained for tax claims. United States v. WaddillSearch
-
United States v. TexasSearch
-
Spokane County v. UnitedSearch
-
Price v. UnitedSearch
-
Stripe v. UnitedSearch
-
capital stock taxes). Judgments recovered by the United States also are debts entitled to priority. United States v. KnottSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial