Citation network
Andres Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 26, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Andres v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 333 U.S. 740 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court Andres v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 333 U.S. 740 (1948) Andres v. UnitedSearch
-
as interpreted by Winston v. UnitedSearch
-
In Winston v. UnitedSearch
-
See American Publishing Co. v. FisherSearch
-
This conclusion is supported by Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
ago by one of the Circuit Courts of Appeals. It rejected the construction for which the Government now contends. Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
of which is far greater in the State courts than in the federal courts. This was the approach of the Court in Winston v. UnitedSearch
-
New Hampshire and Washington. v. NineSearch
-
a. In People v. HicksSearch
-
Winston v. UnitedSearch
-
to death, and fifteen were given life imprisonment. Of the eight sentenced to death, three were executed ( see Arwood v. UnitedSearch
-
Ruhl v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. AustinSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the sentence of one was commuted to life imprisonment ( see Paddy v. UnitedSearch
-
and the sentences of four (including the petitioner here) have been stayed pending their appeals ( see United States v. SamSearch
-
Richard Shockley and United States v. MiranSearch
-
United States v. CarlosSearch
-
State v. HenrySearch
-
Price v. StateSearch
-
State v. GoinsSearch
-
State v. BestSearch
-
State v. BrownSearch
-
that the statute gave the jury full and exclusive discretion as to whether or not to make the recommendation. Howell v. StateSearch
-
E. 706. In Oregon and South Carolina, it is sufficient to charge the jury that they may bring in either verdict. State v. HeckerSearch
-
State v. McLaughlinSearch
-
held that the jury was not confined to the evidence in determining whether or not to make the recommendation. State v. MartinSearch
-
In State v. MolnarSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Andres v. UnitedSearch
-
Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
In People v. HicksSearch
-
Arwood v. UnitedSearch
-
Paddy v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SamSearch
-
State v. BrownSearch
-
Howell v. StateSearch
-
State v. HeckerSearch
-
State v. MartinSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial