Citation network
Ftc Vs. Morton Salt Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 03, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
FTC v. MortonSearch
-
Salt Co. - 334 U.S. 37 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. MortonSearch
-
Salt Co., 334 U.S. 37 (1948) Federal Trade Commission v. MortonSearch
-
aimed at the pricing practices found unlawful, and is neither too broad nor contrary to the principle of Labor Board v. ExpressSearch
-
the seller's actual savings in cost attributable to quantity sales or quantity deliveries. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. FederalSearch
-
of the Act, and are prohibited by it whenever they have the defined effect on competition. See Federal Trade Comm'n v. StaleySearch
-
Corn Products Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Reliance for this contention chiefly rests on Labor Board v. ExpressSearch
-
pointed out that this Court had applied a similar rule to a Federal Trade Commission order in Federal Trade Comm'n v. BeechSearch
-
May Dep't Stores Co. v. LaborSearch
-
Labor Board v. ExpressSearch
-
evidence and make other findings on this phase of the case, should it conclude to do so. See Federal Trade Commission v. RoyalSearch
-
Javierre v. CentralSearch
-
See Moss v. FederalSearch
-
where the competitive injury in question was between sellers. See also Federal Trade Comm'n v. CementSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the harm to competition is effected. It is enough that they 'may' have the prescribed effect. Cf. Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-HoustonSearch
-
United States v. LexingtonSearch
-
least three times and as late as 1945, refused to interpret these laws as doing so. In 1922, in Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-HoustonSearch
-
In 1930, in International Shoe Company v. FederalSearch
-
with such acquisitions as probably will result in lessening competition to a substantial degree, Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-HoustonSearch
-
that its business . . . would probably continue to compete with that of petitioner. See Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-HoustonSearch
-
Corn Products Refining Company v. FederalSearch
-
almost absolute subservience of judicial judgment to administrative experience, cf. Securities and Exchange Commission v. ChenerySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. MortonSearch
-
Federal Trade Commission v. MortonSearch
-
of Labor Board v. ExpressSearch
-
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. FederalSearch
-
See Federal Trade Comm'n v. StaleySearch
-
Federal Trade Comm'n v. BeechSearch
-
May Dep't Stores Co. v. LaborSearch
-
See Federal Trade Commission v. RoyalSearch
-
Federal Trade Comm'n v. CementSearch
-
Cf. Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-HoustonSearch
-
United States v. LexingtonSearch
-
Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-HoustonSearch
-
International Shoe Company v. FederalSearch
-
See Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-HoustonSearch
-
Securities and Exchange Commission v. ChenerySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial