Citation network
Shelley Vs. Kraemer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 03, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 1 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court Shelley v. KraemerSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1948) Shelley v. KraemerSearch
-
it is violative of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment for state courts to enforce them. Corrigan v. BuckleySearch
-
Court which in any way have involved the enforcement of such agreements. The first of these was the case of Corrigan v. BuckleySearch
-
enforcement of those agreements. The second of the cases involving racial restrictive covenants was Hansberry v. LeeSearch
-
This Court has given specific recognition to the same principle. Buchanan v. WarleySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
by state statute or local ordinance. We do not understand respondents to urge the contrary. In the case of Buchanan v. WarleySearch
-
In Harmon v. TylerSearch
-
U. S. 68 (1927), a unanimous court, on the authority of Buchanan v. WarleySearch
-
occupy property and barred on grounds of race or color is clear not only from the language of the opinion in Buchanan v. WarleySearch
-
supra, but from this Court's disposition of the case of Richmond v. DeansSearch
-
terms of the Fourteenth Amendment. Such relief was granted, and this Court affirmed, finding the citation of Buchanan v. WarleySearch
-
supra, and Harmon v. TylerSearch
-
that there has been no action by the State, and the provisions of the Amendment have not been violated. Cf. Corrigan v. BuckleySearch
-
in the earliest cases involving the construction of the terms of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thus, in Virginia v. RivesSearch
-
of the Fourteenth Amendment, are to be found in numerous cases which have been more recently decided. In Twining v. NewSearch
-
In Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSearch
-
whether directed by state statute or taken by a judicial official in the absence of statute. Thus, in Strauder v. WestSearch
-
as a denial of the due process of law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSearch
-
supra. Cf. Pennoyer v. NeffSearch
-
Thus, it has been held that convictions obtained in state courts under the domination of a mob are void. Moore v. DempseySearch
-
U. S. 86 (1923). And see Frank v. MangumSearch
-
Thus, in American Federation of Labor v. SwingSearch
-
In Cantwell v. ConnecticutSearch
-
of the case, found to be a violation of the Amendment's commands relating to freedom of religion. In Bridges v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy R. Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
Strauder v. WestSearch
-
legitimate exercise of the state's police power, but violated the guaranty of the equal protection of the laws. Oyama v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Cf. Buchanan v. WarleySearch
-
and enforce property interests must be exercised within the boundaries defined by the Fourteenth Amendment. Cf. Marsh v. AlabamaSearch
-
Together with No. 87, McGhee et al. v. SipesSearch
-
Kraemer v. ShelleySearch
-
Sipes v. McGheeSearch
-
In Oyama v. CaliforniaSearch
-
and Virginia have also declared similar statutes invalid as being in contravention of the Fourteenth Amendment. Glover v. AtlantaSearch
-
Jackson v. StateSearch
-
Clinard v. Winston-SalemSearch
-
Allen v. OklahomaSearch
-
Liberty Annex Corp. v. DallasSearch
-
Irvine v. CliftonSearch
-
United States v. HarrisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial