Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Saia Vs. New York

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 07, 1948

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 3 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. BaldwIn Vs. Missouri US Supreme Court · May 26, 1930
  2. Cantwell Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · May 20, 1940
  3. Hatch Vs. Reardon US Supreme Court · Jan 07, 1907
  4. Saia v. New
    Search
  5. York - 334 U.S. 558 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court Saia v. New
    Search
  6. York, 334 U.S. 558 (1948) Saia v. New
    Search
  7. to which they must be adjusted. The ordinance therefore has all the vices of the ones which we struck down in Cantwell v. Connecticut
    Search
  8. Lovell v. Griffin
    Search
  9. U. S. 444 , and Hague v. CIO
    Search
  10. in the licensing system did not save the ordinance from condemnation on the grounds of previous restraint. Lovell v. Griffin
    Search
  11. In Hague v. CIO
    Search
  12. in that process, they should be mindful to keep the freedoms of the First Amendment in a preferred position. See Marsh v. Alabama
    Search
  13. Cox v. New
    Search
  14. depart from the rule of these earlier cases, but reemphasized the vice of the type of ordinance we have here. Davis v. Massachusetts
    Search
  15. by speech or pen can neither be forbidden nor licensed, save in the familiar classes of exceptional situations. Lovell v. Griffin
    Search
  16. Hague v. CIO
    Search
  17. Schneider v. Irvington
    Search
  18. Chaplinsky v. New
    Search
  19. system whereby a minor official determines whether a cause is religious. This was the problem presented by Cantwell v. Connecticut
    Search
  20. see Judge Augustus N. Hand in United States v. Kauten
    Search
  21. the park, or that the appellant would have been denied permission to use such equipment in the ball field. See Lehon v. Atlanta
    Search
  22. U. S. 53 . State action cannot be found hypothetically unconstitutional. New York ex rel. Hatch v. Reardon
    Search
  23. conflicting interests which the State was here entitled to make in view of time and place and circumstances. See Cox v. New
    Search
  24. McCollum v. Board
    Search
  25. whether a Police Chief is the appropriate authority to control permits for setting up sound-amplifying apparatus. Cox v. New
    Search
  26. More than fifty years ago, this Court, in Davis v. Massachusetts
    Search
  27. was not overruled in the cases cited by the Court. And all of those cases were considered and distinguished in Cox v. New
    Search
  28. licensing of parades and processions in public streets even for admittedly religious purposes. The case of Hague v. CIO
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Saia v. New
    Search
  30. and Hague v. CIO
    Search
  31. See Marsh v. Alabama
    Search
  32. Davis v. Massachusetts
    Search
  33. United States v. Kauten
    Search
  34. See Lehon v. Atlanta
    Search
  35. See Cox v. New
    Search
  36. of Hague v. CIO
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial