Citation network
EstIn Vs. Estin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 07, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 541 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court Estin v. EstinSearch
-
U.S. 541 (1948) Estin v. EstinSearch
-
App.Div. 829, 66 N.Y.S.2d 421, and then by the Court of Appeals. 296 N.Y. 308, 73 N.E.2d 113. We held in Williams v. NorthSearch
-
to prima facie weight, it is not conclusive in a sister State, but might be relitigated there. And see Esenwein v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
only so long as the relation of husband and wife exists, and that in New York, as in some other states, see Esenwein v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
one side the case where the wife was personally served or where she appears in the divorce proceedings. Cf. Yarborough v. YarboroughSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Davis v. DavisSearch
-
of both parties in all the other States of the Union, as well as in Nevada. Page 334 U. S. 545 Williams v. NorthSearch
-
other legal incidence of the marriage was necessarily affected. Although the point was not adjudicated in Barber v. BarberSearch
-
State, because its enforcement would contravene the latter's policy, have been few and far between. See Williams v. NorthSearch
-
earlier principles of comity, and thus basically altered the status of the States as independent sovereigns. Williams v. NorthSearch
-
are exacting, if not inexorable ( Sherrer v. SherrerSearch
-
the legitimacy of the offspring of marriage. It is the basis of criminal laws, as the bigamy prosecution in Williams v. NorthSearch
-
the matrimonial domicile to change the marital status of the parties by an ex parte divorce proceeding, Thompson v. ThompsonSearch
-
however, apparently follows the rule that dissolution of the marriage puts and end to a support order. See Herrick v. HerrickSearch
-
judgment when she was not personally served or did not appear in the proceeding. Page 334 U. S. 548 Bassett v. BassettSearch
-
from control or power over the persons whose relationships are the source of the rights and obligations. Cf. Curry v. McCanlessSearch
-
some control over the debt which he owes. It can, for example, levy a tax on its transfer by will ( Blackstone v. MillerSearch
-
S. 174 , 316 U. S. 176 -177) appropriate it through garnishment or attachment ( Chicago, R.I. & P. R. Co. v. SturmSearch
-
Harris v. BalkSearch
-
U. S. 215 ), collect it and administer it for the benefit of creditors. Clark v. WilliardSearch
-
Fischer v. AmericanSearch
-
personally served or appears in the proceeding. The existence of any such power has been repeatedly denied. Pennoyer v. NeffSearch
-
is not entitled to the full faith and credit which the Constitution and statute of the United States demand. Hansberry v. LeeSearch
-
Williams v. NorthSearch
-
question whether, in any event, that judgment would be entitled to full faith and credit in Nevada. See Sistare v. SistareSearch
-
See Bingham, In the Matter of Haddock v. HaddockSearch
-
Holt, The Bones of Haddock v. HaddockSearch
-
Cook, Is Haddock v. HaddockSearch
-
As respects statutes, see the discussion in Williams v. NorthSearch
-
The case is unlike Thompson v. ThompsonSearch
-
Miller v. MillerSearch
-
survives a decree of divorce within the scope of enforceability of the rule in Williams Page 334 U. S. 550 v. NorthSearch
-
a federal right, given by the Full Faith and Credit Clause, under the guise of a determination of State law. Cf. Davis v. WechslerSearch
-
maintenance decree in Pennsylvania -- which treats such decrees as terminated by any valid divorce, see Esenwein v. CommonwealthSearch
-
dispel my doubts. Neither do the cases cited in the Court of Appeals' opinion, which, with the exception of Wagster v. WagsterSearch
-
divorce to dissolve its prior separate maintenance decree, but it may not, consistently with Williams v. NorthSearch
-
Minnesota v. NationalSearch
-
decision with the command that it be given full faith and credit. For reasons which I stated in dissenting in Williams v. NorthSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Estin v. EstinSearch
-
Esenwein v. PennsylvaniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial