Citation network
Phyle Vs. Duffy
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 07, 1948
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 431 (1948) U.S. Supreme Court Phyle v. DuffySearch
-
U.S. 431 (1948) Phyle v. DuffySearch
-
that petitioner is insane. Pp. 334 U. S. 440 -442. (b) Nobles v. GeorgiaSearch
-
for murder in the first degree imposed by a California superior court and affirmed by the State Supreme Court. People v. PhyleSearch
-
kind of judicial adjudication or review on the question of sanity, the State Supreme Court primarily relied on Nobles v. GeorgiaSearch
-
principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions, Adamson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
the unreviewable ex parte determination of a crucial fact made by a single executive officer. See Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSearch
-
that the petitioner is insane. New York ex rel. Whitman v. WilsonSearch
-
U. S. 173 . See also Simon v. CraftSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
It has been held that the writ may issue against the Secretary of State, Hutchinson v. BrownSearch
-
Cal. 189, 54 P. 738, or even against the Governor. Elliott v. PardeeSearch
-
however, that mandamus would not be available under California law if there is another adequate remedy, see Kahn v. SmithSearch
-
Although it has been said that generally the writ will issue only to correct an abuse of discretion, Bank of Italy v. JohnsonSearch
-
it has also been pointed out that, in some circumstances, writs can issue to compel action in a particular way. Wood v. StrotherSearch
-
Landsborough v. KellySearch
-
of one which authorized him to apply directly to a court for a full hearing. For this Court held in Nobles v. GeorgiaSearch
-
situation, we find no federal constitutional question presented which is ripe for decision here. So here, as in Woods v. NierstheimerSearch
-
People v. PhyleSearch
-
Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
Regal Drug Corporation v. WardellSearch
-
Dent v. WestSearch
-
Brown v. NewSearch
-
St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Union Ins. Co. v. HogeSearch
-
Fox v. StandardSearch
-
Driscoll v. EdisonSearch
-
See Edison Co. v. LaborSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Phyle v. DuffySearch
-
Nobles v. GeorgiaSearch
-
the State Supreme Court. People v. PhyleSearch
-
Adamson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
See Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSearch
-
Whitman v. WilsonSearch
-
the Secretary of State, Hutchinson v. BrownSearch
-
the Governor. Elliott v. PardeeSearch
-
Kahn v. SmithSearch
-
Bank of Italy v. JohnsonSearch
-
Wood v. StrotherSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial